Literature DB >> 19811511

Contradictions in the treatment of traumatic dental injuries and ways to proceed in dental trauma research.

Jens Ove Andreasen1, Eva Lauridsen, Frances Meriam Andreasen.   

Abstract

Almost all treatment procedures used for dental traumas are still today not evidence-based, a fact, which makes it difficult to analyse the long-term outcome of healing and its relationship to treatment. Crown fractures with extensive dentin exposure represent a dominant injury in the permanent dentition. Accepted treatment philosophy is dentin coverage (dental liner and/or dentin bonded restoration) to prevent bacteria penetration into the pulp. Today there is, apart from deep proximal fractures, no evidence that this treatment is necessary to protect the pulp. In case of luxation injuries, the accepted treatment principles appear to be anatomically correct repositioning, stabilization with a splint and sometimes antibiotic coverage. In clinical studies, these principles could not be proven to optimize either periodontal or pulpal healing, the explanation possibly being that both reposition and application of splints in certain cases add extra damage to the pulp and periodontal ligament. In case of root fractures with dislocation, fast and optimal repositioning and rigid long-term splinting (i.e. 3 months) have been considered the principle of treatment. However, a recent clinical study has shown that short-term splinting with a semi-rigid splint appears to optimize fracture healing. In tooth avulsion with subsequent replantation, cleansing of the root surface for contamination and systemic antibiotics has been considered essential for pulp and periodontal healing. These treatment concepts have been derived from experimental studies in animals. However, their importance could not be verified in large clinical studies. Ideally, randomized clinical studies are needed in the future for selected trauma types. The influences of repositioning, splinting and the role of infection and antibiotics should be further investigated. However, for ethical reasons, it will be difficult to perform randomized studies on trauma victims and we will be forced in the future to rely on experimental animal studies supported by clinical observational studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19811511     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00818.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Traumatol        ISSN: 1600-4469            Impact factor:   3.333


  5 in total

1.  Long-term effects of traumatic injuries to incisors and periodontal tissues during childhood: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Susanne Wriedt; Monika Martin; Bilal Al-Nawas; Heiner Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Validation of a new experimental model of extrusive luxation on maxillary molars of rats: a histological study.

Authors:  Luciana Artioli Costa; Luana Martins Cantanhede; Erika Martins Pereira; Marcelo Macedo Crivelini; Osmar Aparecido Cuoghi; Alex Luiz Pozzobon Pereira; Marcos Rogério de Mendonça
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Retrospective evaluation of patients admitted to Karadeniz Technical University Pediatric Dentistry clinic due to trauma.

Authors:  Ayca Kurt; Omer Faruk Guduk; Sengul Merve Erbek; Ozgul Baygin; Tamer Tuzuner
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2019-05-01

4.  Treatment and restoration of adult dentoalveolar trauma: A clinical case report.

Authors:  Blanca Serra-Pastor; Miguel Penarrocha-Diago; María Penarrocha-Diago; Rubén Agustín-Panadero
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-12-01

5.  Management of a Complex Dentoalveolar Traumatic Injury with Multiple Avulsions.

Authors:  Anita Thakur; Seema Thakur
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2021-06-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.