BACKGROUND AND AIM: To assess the Farsi (Persian) translated and modified version of the questionnaire of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) for measuring professionalism, and also, measuring the professional attitudes and behaviors associated with the medical residency training environment in Iran. METHODS: After a pilot study, a 17-item questionnaire was distributed to 282 medical residents of two major universities of Iran, from December 2006 through February 2007. RESULTS: Of the 282 distributed questionnaires, 259 (95.2%) were used in the analysis. Based on the analyses, two items were omitted and 15 items were retained for further analysis. The mean score was 106 (Standard Deviation (SD), 22.4) out of maximum 150, whereas the item mean was 6.12 (SD, 0.37) out of maximum 10. Corrected item-to-total correlations ranged from low to moderate. The internal reliability of the scale, based on Cronbach's alpha, meets Nunnally's minimal requirement. A factor analysis was performed, based on principal components and varimax rotation. The solution identified three factors (subscales) including excellence, honor/integrity and altruism/respect. Together these factors represented 58.8% of the common variance. CONCLUSION: This study showed the content validity and internal reliability of the Farsi version of the ABIM questionnaire. Therefore, it can be considered as an encouraging step toward developing a short, reliable and valid instrument for measuring professionalism in medical environments.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: To assess the Farsi (Persian) translated and modified version of the questionnaire of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) for measuring professionalism, and also, measuring the professional attitudes and behaviors associated with the medical residency training environment in Iran. METHODS: After a pilot study, a 17-item questionnaire was distributed to 282 medical residents of two major universities of Iran, from December 2006 through February 2007. RESULTS: Of the 282 distributed questionnaires, 259 (95.2%) were used in the analysis. Based on the analyses, two items were omitted and 15 items were retained for further analysis. The mean score was 106 (Standard Deviation (SD), 22.4) out of maximum 150, whereas the item mean was 6.12 (SD, 0.37) out of maximum 10. Corrected item-to-total correlations ranged from low to moderate. The internal reliability of the scale, based on Cronbach's alpha, meets Nunnally's minimal requirement. A factor analysis was performed, based on principal components and varimax rotation. The solution identified three factors (subscales) including excellence, honor/integrity and altruism/respect. Together these factors represented 58.8% of the common variance. CONCLUSION: This study showed the content validity and internal reliability of the Farsi version of the ABIM questionnaire. Therefore, it can be considered as an encouraging step toward developing a short, reliable and valid instrument for measuring professionalism in medical environments.