OBJECTIVES: Since 2001, an e-learning tool has been developed for dentistry. To compare online self study with traditional lectures, a module about instrumental occlusal analysis was offered by oral lecture and by a unit in the virtual library of the e-learning tool. METHODS:85 pre-clinical dental students were randomly divided into two groups: the computer assisted learning (CAL) group (n = 48) and the lecture group (n = 37). A pre-test was made to assess the students' basic knowledge. The first post-test and the scoring of the teaching methods were performed immediately after the lecture or the self studying by the online tool and a second post-test six weeks later. RESULTS: The oral lecture got better educational and enjoyment values. The students prefer CAL in addition to traditional lectures. The results of the pre-tests were not different between the two groups (p = 0.706). The lecture group significantly improved their scores in the first post-test (p = 0.011), but the scores of the second post-test did not differ significantly (p = 0.157). CONCLUSIONS: In the short term, knowledge acquisition seems to be better in oral lectures but in the long term there is no difference in knowledge retention between the two learning scenarios.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Since 2001, an e-learning tool has been developed for dentistry. To compare online self study with traditional lectures, a module about instrumental occlusal analysis was offered by oral lecture and by a unit in the virtual library of the e-learning tool. METHODS: 85 pre-clinical dental students were randomly divided into two groups: the computer assisted learning (CAL) group (n = 48) and the lecture group (n = 37). A pre-test was made to assess the students' basic knowledge. The first post-test and the scoring of the teaching methods were performed immediately after the lecture or the self studying by the online tool and a second post-test six weeks later. RESULTS: The oral lecture got better educational and enjoyment values. The students prefer CAL in addition to traditional lectures. The results of the pre-tests were not different between the two groups (p = 0.706). The lecture group significantly improved their scores in the first post-test (p = 0.011), but the scores of the second post-test did not differ significantly (p = 0.157). CONCLUSIONS: In the short term, knowledge acquisition seems to be better in oral lectures but in the long term there is no difference in knowledge retention between the two learning scenarios.
Authors: Pradeep Paul George; Nikos Papachristou; José Marcano Belisario; Wei Wang; Petra A Wark; Ziva Cotic; Kristine Rasmussen; René Sluiter; Eva Riboli-Sasco; Lorainne Tudor Car; Eve Marie Musulanov; Joseph Antonio Molina; Bee Hoon Heng; Yanfeng Zhang; Erica Lynette Wheeler; Najeeb Al Shorbaji; Azeem Majeed; Josip Car Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.413