Literature DB >> 19810663

Intraocular straylight and contrast sensitivity after contralateral wavefront-guided LASIK and wavefront-guided PRK for myopia.

Jackson Barreto1, Mirella T S Barboni, Claudia Feitosa-Santana, João R Sato, Samir J Bechara, Dora F Ventura, Milton Ruiz Alves.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular straylight measurements and contrast sensitivity after wavefront-guided LASIK (WFG LASIK) in one eye and wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (WFG PRK) in the fellow eye for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized study of 22 eyes of 11 patients who underwent simultaneous WFG LASIK and WFG PRK (contralateral eye). Both groups were treated with the NIDEK Advanced Vision Excimer Laser System, and a microkeratome was used for flap creation in the WFG LASIK group. High and low contrast visual acuity, wavefront analysis, contrast sensitivity, and retinal straylight measurements were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A third-generation straylight meter, C-Quant (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH), was used for measuring intraocular straylight.
RESULTS: Twelve months postoperatively, mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was -0.06 +/- 0.07 logMAR in the WFG LASIK group and -0.10 +/- 0.10 logMAR in the WFG PRK group. Mean preoperative intraocular straylight was 0.94 +/- 0.12 logs for the WFG LASIK group and 0.96 +/- 0.11 logs for the WFG PRK group. After 12 months, the mean straylight value was 1.01 +/- 0.1 log s for the WFG LASIK group and 0.97 +/- 0.12 log s for the WFG PRK group. No difference was found between techniques after 12 months (P = .306). No significant difference in photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity between groups was noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular straylight showed no statistically significant increase 1 year after WFG LASIK and WFG PRK. Higher order aberrations increased significantly after surgery for both groups. Nevertheless, WFG LASIK and WFG PRK yielded excellent visual acuity and contrast sensitivity performance without significant differences between techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19810663     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090930-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  6 in total

1.  Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (Lasik) versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (Prk): a prospective randomized eye-to-eye comparison (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Edward E Manche; Weldon W Haw
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

2.  Single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in high myopia: qualitative and quantitative visual functions.

Authors:  Soheil Adib-Moghaddam; Saeed Soleyman-Jahi; Fatemeh Adili-Aghdam; Samuel Arba Mosquera; Niloofar Hoorshad; Salar Tofighi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  The Incidence and Natural History of Subjectively and Objectively Determined Metrics of Light Scattering in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis.

Authors:  Karolinne M Rocha; Ryan N Mercer; William J Dupps; Ronald R Krueger
Journal:  EC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-18

4.  A Prospective Comparison of Wavefront-Guided LASIK versus Wavefront-Guided PRK After Previous Keratorefractive Surgery.

Authors:  Michele D Lee; Lisa Y Chen; Elaine M Tran; Edward E Manche
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-20

5.  Intra-Operative Discomfort in Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Authors:  Samuel M Philbrick; John L Bennion
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-13

6.  Wavefront-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy with the Use of a New Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer in Patients with Myopia and Compound Myopic Astigmatism.

Authors:  Steven C Schallhorn; Jan A Venter; Stephen J Hannan; Keith A Hettinger
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.