Literature DB >> 19810112

Effect of low level capacitive-coupled pulsed electric field stimulation on mineral profile of weight-bearing bones in ovariectomized rats.

Jayanand Manjhi1, Rashmi Mathur, Jitendra Behari.   

Abstract

Mineral content, mineral composition, and crystalline pattern of bone in osteoporosis are different from those of normal individuals. Present management of bone mineral loss is rather unsatisfactory primarily because of socioeconomic factors and untoward effects of the treatment drugs. We report the efficacy of capacitive-coupled pulsed electric field (CCPEF) to prevent bone loss in an ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis. One month postsurgery either leg was stimulated with CCPEF, whereas the other leg did not receive any stimulation (sham exposed). The treatment was given in 60 sessions each of 2 h/d (5 days a week). The control group of rats was sham operated. At the end of the observation period, femur and tibia bones were removed. Their bone mineral content (BMC), calcium, phosphorus, and carbon contents were analyzed and bone mineral density (BMD) was calculated. The BMC data were supported by X-ray diffraction (XRD) method. In sham-exposed bones, a statistically significant decrease in BMC, BMD, calcium, and phosphorus contents were obtained as compared to the control. Although in CCPEF bones, there was an attenuation of decrement in the noted parameters except phosphorus. XRD pattern supported these observations. The results suggest that chronic, 60 sessions of 2 h/d, 5 d/wk CCPEF (14 MHz with 16 Hz modulation 16 Hz and 10 V peak to peak) is effective in attenuating the ovariectomy-induced bone mineral loss in rats. (c) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19810112     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  5 in total

1.  Physical Stimulations for Bone and Cartilage Regeneration.

Authors:  Xiaobin Huang; Ritopa Das; Avi Patel; Thanh Duc Nguyen
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2018-06-25

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  The therapeutic effect of a pulsed electromagnetic field on the reproductive patterns of male Wistar rats exposed to a 2.45-GHz microwave field.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Kavindra Kumar Kesari; Jitendra Behari
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Capacitive technologies for highly controlled and personalized electrical stimulation by implantable biomedical systems.

Authors:  Marco P Soares Dos Santos; J Coutinho; Ana Marote; Bárbara Sousa; A Ramos; Jorge A F Ferreira; Rodrigo Bernardo; André Rodrigues; A Torres Marques; Odete A B da Cruz E Silva; Edward P Furlani; José A O Simões; Sandra I Vieira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Electronic Bone Growth Stimulators for Augmentation of Osteogenesis in In Vitro and In Vivo Models: A Narrative Review of Electrical Stimulation Mechanisms and Device Specifications.

Authors:  Peter J Nicksic; D'Andrea T Donnelly; Madison Hesse; Simran Bedi; Nishant Verma; Allison J Seitz; Andrew J Shoffstall; Kip A Ludwig; Aaron M Dingle; Samuel O Poore
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.