Literature DB >> 19809781

Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: a pictorial review of novel insights into pathophysiological features revealed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Ryota Shimofusa1, Takuya Ueda, Takashi Kishimoto, Masayuki Nakajima, Masaharu Yoshikawa, Fukuo Kondo, Hisao Ito.   

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is one of the most powerful modalities for the assessment of HCC with sufficient sensitivity and specificity. In addition to its capacity for lesion detection, MR imaging delineates some unique in vivo pathophysiological features of tumors, which cannot be assessed by other modalities. Chemical shift imaging may depict steatosis of the tumor. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the most powerful tool to assess the vascularity of the tumor, which is closely related to malignant transformation in hepatocarcinogenesis. Diffusion-weighted imaging illustrates the cellularity of the tumor. Super-paramagnetic iron oxide, a liver-specific MR contrast agent accumulating in Kupffer cells, enables detection of the hepatocellular architecture in the lesion. Recently, a new liver-specific MR contrast agent, gadoxetic acid [gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl (Gd-EOB)-diethylenetriaminopentoacetic acid (DTPA)], has been introduced for clinical imaging. Gd-EOB-DTPA has a significant impact on the imaging of HCC, with potential capacity for the concurrent assessment of vascularity of the tumor and hepatocellular-specific properties within the tumor. Understanding the characteristics of MR imaging methods and contrast agents is essential for the optimal diagnosis and characterization of HCCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19809781     DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0198-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  6 in total

1.  Detection and characterization of liver lesions using gadoxetic acid as a tissue-specific contrast agent.

Authors:  Peter Reimer; Rolf Vosshenrich
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-08-09

2.  Inter-observer agreement on the assessment of relative liver lesion signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase imaging with gadoxetate (Gd-EOB-DTPA).

Authors:  Sharon Ngu; Lizza Lebron-Zapata; Christy Pomeranz; Seth Katz; Scott Gerst; Junting Zheng; Chaya Moskowitz; Richard K G Do
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-01

3.  Gadoxetate acid-enhanced MRI of hepatocellular carcinoma in a c-myc/TGFα transgenic mouse model including signal intensity and fat content: initial experience.

Authors:  Huedayi Korkusuz; Lea Knau; Wolfgang Kromen; Frank Huebner; Renate Hammerstingl; Sebastian Lindemayr; Verena Bihrer; Albrecht Piiper; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Focal hepatic lesions in Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI: the atlas.

Authors:  José Traila Campos; Claude B Sirlin; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2012-06-15

5.  The value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging in characterizing cirrhotic nodules with atypical enhancement on Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR images.

Authors:  Yi-Chun Wang; Chen-Te Chou; Ching-Po Lin; Yao-Li Chen; Yung-Fang Chen; Ran-Chou Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 vs. CEUS LI-RADS v2017-Can Things Be Put Together?

Authors:  Cosmin Caraiani; Bianca Boca; Vlad Bura; Zeno Sparchez; Yi Dong; Christoph Dietrich
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.