OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acute toxicity of rofecoxib during concurrent use with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: We evaluated 67 FIGO stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer patients treated with CCRT between June 2002 and July 2004. The study group included patients who received rofecoxib (N=30) and the control group included patients who received CCRT only (N=37). The patients' medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, toxicity related to CCRT and treatment results. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in toxicity between the two groups. The most common acute grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (13.3% in the study group and 21.6% in the control group). Grade 3/4 late toxicity was observed in 2 (6.6%) patients in the study group and 3 (8.1%) in the control group. There was no treatment-related deaths in either group. Six (20.0%) patients in the study group had treatment failure. In the control group, 6 (16.2%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression-free and overall survival was 55.8+/-4.2 and 59.0+/-2.8 months, respectively, in the study group, and 69.7+/-4.3 and 71.6+/-3.6 months, respectively, in the control group. There were no differences in progression-free and overall survival between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that rofecoxib, at a dose of 25 mg twice daily, has acceptable acute toxicity as a radiosensitizer during CCRT. Although rofecoxib was not efficacious as a radiosensitizer in the present study, the benefit of rofecoxib as a radiosensitizer should be further evaluated in a prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acute toxicity of rofecoxib during concurrent use with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: We evaluated 67 FIGO stage IB2-IVA cervical cancerpatients treated with CCRT between June 2002 and July 2004. The study group included patients who received rofecoxib (N=30) and the control group included patients who received CCRT only (N=37). The patients' medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, toxicity related to CCRT and treatment results. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in toxicity between the two groups. The most common acute grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (13.3% in the study group and 21.6% in the control group). Grade 3/4 late toxicity was observed in 2 (6.6%) patients in the study group and 3 (8.1%) in the control group. There was no treatment-related deaths in either group. Six (20.0%) patients in the study group had treatment failure. In the control group, 6 (16.2%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression-free and overall survival was 55.8+/-4.2 and 59.0+/-2.8 months, respectively, in the study group, and 69.7+/-4.3 and 71.6+/-3.6 months, respectively, in the control group. There were no differences in progression-free and overall survival between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that rofecoxib, at a dose of 25 mg twice daily, has acceptable acute toxicity as a radiosensitizer during CCRT. Although rofecoxib was not efficacious as a radiosensitizer in the present study, the benefit of rofecoxib as a radiosensitizer should be further evaluated in a prospective study.
Authors: G Ferrandina; L Lauriola; M G Distefano; G F Zannoni; M Gessi; F Legge; N Maggiano; S Mancuso; A Capelli; G Scambia; F O Ranelletti Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G Steinbach; P M Lynch; R K Phillips; M H Wallace; E Hawk; G B Gordon; N Wakabayashi; B Saunders; Y Shen; T Fujimura; L K Su; B Levin; L Godio; S Patterson; M A Rodriguez-Bigas; S L Jester; K L King; M Schumacher; J Abbruzzese; R N DuBois; W N Hittelman; S Zimmerman; J W Sherman; G Kelloff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Morris; P J Eifel; J Lu; P W Grigsby; C Levenback; R E Stevens; M Rotman; D M Gershenson; D G Mutch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-04-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: W A Peters; P Y Liu; R J Barrett; R J Stock; B J Monk; J S Berek; L Souhami; P Grigsby; W Gordon; D S Alberts Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 44.544