Literature DB >> 19809281

Ultrasound evaluation of the sacral area and comparison of sacral interspinous and hiatal approach for caudal block in children.

Seo K Shin1, Jeong Yeon Hong, Won Oak Kim, Bon Nyeo Koo, Jee Eun Kim, Hae Keum Kil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although caudal block via the sacral hiatus is a common regional technique in children, it is sometimes difficult to identify the hiatus. A needle approach via the S2-3 interspace can be used as an alternative to the conventional approach. The authors compared the feasibility and clinical characteristics between the S2-3 approach and hiatal approach, in addition to ultrasound study.
METHODS: Sacral space depth, dural sac end level, and caudal space depth were evaluated using ultrasound with high-frequency linear probe in the lateral decubitus position in 317 anesthetized children (study 1). In another 162 children who underwent ambulatory urological surgeries, success rate, drug spread, and clinical characteristics were compared between the hiatal and S2-3 approaches (study 2).
RESULTS: The dural sac end level was S2U (S3M-L5M). The median depth of the sacral space at the S2-3 level was 7.3 mm, whereas the caudal space depth at the hiatus was 2.9 mm. The overall success rate was 96.3% in both groups. The success rates at the first puncture attempt were 96.2% in the S2-3 group and 77.5% in the hiatus group. Drug spread level and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The S2-3 approach can be applied as a useful fallback method to the conventional landmark approach in children, especially in those older than 36 months who present with difficult identification of the sacral hiatus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19809281     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bc6dd4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  9 in total

1.  A study of the effect of caudal epidural block on bispectral index targeted propofol requirement in children: A comparative study.

Authors:  Abhishek Banerjee; Bibhukalyani Das; Dipankar Mukherjee; Moushumi Khanra
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

2.  Caudal analgesia reduces the sevoflurane requirement for LMA removal in anesthetized children.

Authors:  Joon-Sik Kim; Wyun Kon Park; Min-Huiy Lee; Kyu-Hyun Hwang; Hee-Soo Kim; Jeong Rim Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-06-23

3.  Where is the apex of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block in the pediatric population? A radio-anatomic study.

Authors:  Aynur Emine Cicekcibasi; Hale Borazan; Sule Arıcan; Mehmet Tugrul Yılmaz; Mehmet Emin Sakarya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  The use of ultrasound guidance for perioperative neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks in children.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Santhanam Suresh; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-27

Review 5.  The Options for Neuraxial Drug Administration.

Authors:  Henning Hermanns; Elke M E Bos; Mark L van Zuylen; Markus W Hollmann; Markus F Stevens
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.497

6.  Morphologic diversities of sacral canal in children; three-dimensional computed tomographic study.

Authors:  Dae Wook Kim; Seung Jun Lee; Eun Joo Choi; Pyung Bok Lee; Young Hyun Jo; Francis Sahngun Nahm
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2014-06-30

7.  The role of ultrasound guidance in pediatric caudal block.

Authors:  Koray Erbüyün; Barış Açıkgöz; Gülay Ok; Ömer Yılmaz; Gökhan Temeltaş; İdil Tekin; Demet Tok
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 8.  Caudal and epidural blocks in infants and small children: historical perspective and ultrasound-guided approaches.

Authors:  Hae Keum Kil
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-08-08

9.  Correlation of correct needle placement in caudal epidural space and anatomical structures of sacral canal in paediatric patients: An observational study.

Authors:  Anuj Jain; Swapnil K Barasker; Suruchi Jain; Vaishali Waindeskar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-05-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.