Literature DB >> 19808732

Landfilling of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.

Simone Manfredi1, Davide Tonini, Thomas H Christensen, Heijo Scharff.   

Abstract

Accounting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from waste landfilling is summarized with the focus on processes and technical data for a number of different landfilling technologies: open dump (which was included as the worst-case-scenario), conventional landfills with flares and with energy recovery, and landfills receiving low-organic-carbon waste. The results showed that direct emissions of GHG from the landfill systems (primarily dispersive release of methane) are the major contributions to the GHG accounting, up to about 1000 kg CO(2)-eq. tonne( -1) for the open dump, 300 kg CO(2)-eq. tonne( -1) for conventional landfilling of mixed waste and 70 kg CO(2)-eq. tonne(-1) for low-organic-carbon waste landfills. The load caused by indirect, upstream emissions from provision of energy and materials to the landfill was low, here estimated to be up to 16 kg CO(2)-eq. tonne(-1). On the other hand, utilization of landfill gas for electricity generation contributed to major savings, in most cases, corresponding to about half of the load caused by direct GHG emission from the landfill. However, this saving can vary significantly depending on what the generated electricity substitutes for. Significant amounts of biogenic carbon may still be stored within the landfill body after 100 years, which here is counted as a saved GHG emission. With respect to landfilling of mixed waste with energy recovery, the net, average GHG accounting ranged from about -70 to 30 kg CO(2)-eq. tonne(- 1), obtained by summing the direct and indirect (upstream and downstream) emissions and accounting for stored biogenic carbon as a saving. However, if binding of biogenic carbon was not accounted for, the overall GHG load would be in the range of 60 to 300 kg CO(2)-eq. tonne( -1). This paper clearly shows that electricity generation as well as accounting of stored biogenic carbon are crucial to the accounting of GHG of waste landfilling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19808732     DOI: 10.1177/0734242X09348529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag Res


  6 in total

Review 1.  A global prospective of income distribution and its effect on life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management: a review.

Authors:  Pooja Yadav; S R Samadder
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Analyzing tree cores to detect petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated groundwater at a former landfill site in the community of Happy Valley-Goose Bay, eastern Canadian subarctic.

Authors:  Merline L D Fonkwe; Stefan Trapp
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Climate change mitigation opportunities based on carbon footprint estimates of dietary patterns in Peru.

Authors:  Ian Vázquez-Rowe; Gustavo Larrea-Gallegos; Pedro Villanueva-Rey; Alessandro Gilardino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues.

Authors:  Navarro Ferronato; Vincenzo Torretta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Effects of pyrolysis temperature, feedstock type and compaction on water retention of biochar amended soil.

Authors:  He Huang; Narala Gangadhara Reddy; Xilong Huang; Peinan Chen; Peiying Wang; Yuantian Zhang; Yuanxu Huang; Peng Lin; Ankit Garg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The plastics integrated assessment model (PLAIA): Assessing emission mitigation pathways and circular economy strategies for the plastics sector.

Authors:  Paul Stegmann; Vassilis Daioglou; Marc Londo; Martin Junginger
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2022-03-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.