BACKGROUND: Inflammation and neovascularization play critical roles in the stability of atherosclerotic plaques. Whole-body quantitative assessment of these plaque features may improve patient risk-stratification for life-threatening thromboembolic events and direct appropriate intervention. In this report, we determined the utility of the MR contrast agent gadofluorine-M (GdF) for staging plaque stability and compared this to the conventional agent Gd-DTPA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five control and 7 atherosclerotic rabbits were sequentially imaged after administration of Gd-DTPA (0.2 mmol/kg) and GdF (0.1 mmol/kg) using a T(1)-weighted pulse sequence on a 3-T MRI scanner. Diseased aortic wall could be distinguished from normal wall based on wall-to-muscle contrast-to-noise values after GdF administration. RAM-11 (macrophages) and CD-31 (endothelial cells) immunostaining of MR-matched histological sections revealed that GdF accumulation was related to the degree of inflammation at the surface of plaques and the extent of core neovascularization. Importantly, an MR measure of GdF accumulation at both 1 and 24 hours after injection but not Gd-DTPA at peak enhancement was shown to correlate with a quantitative histological morphology index related to these 2 plaque features. CONCLUSIONS: GdF-enhanced MRI of atherosclerotic plaques allows noninvasive quantitative information about plaque composition to be acquired at multiple time points after injection (within 1 and up to 24 hours after injection). This dramatically widens the imaging window for assessing plaque stability that is currently attainable with clinically approved MR agents, therefore opening the possibility of whole-body (including coronary) detection of unstable plaques in the future and potentially improved mitigation of cataclysmic cardiovascular events.
BACKGROUND:Inflammation and neovascularization play critical roles in the stability of atherosclerotic plaques. Whole-body quantitative assessment of these plaque features may improve patient risk-stratification for life-threatening thromboembolic events and direct appropriate intervention. In this report, we determined the utility of the MR contrast agent gadofluorine-M (GdF) for staging plaque stability and compared this to the conventional agent Gd-DTPA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five control and 7 atherosclerotic rabbits were sequentially imaged after administration of Gd-DTPA (0.2 mmol/kg) and GdF (0.1 mmol/kg) using a T(1)-weighted pulse sequence on a 3-T MRI scanner. Diseased aortic wall could be distinguished from normal wall based on wall-to-muscle contrast-to-noise values after GdF administration. RAM-11 (macrophages) and CD-31 (endothelial cells) immunostaining of MR-matched histological sections revealed that GdF accumulation was related to the degree of inflammation at the surface of plaques and the extent of core neovascularization. Importantly, an MR measure of GdF accumulation at both 1 and 24 hours after injection but not Gd-DTPA at peak enhancement was shown to correlate with a quantitative histological morphology index related to these 2 plaque features. CONCLUSIONS:GdF-enhanced MRI of atherosclerotic plaques allows noninvasive quantitative information about plaque composition to be acquired at multiple time points after injection (within 1 and up to 24 hours after injection). This dramatically widens the imaging window for assessing plaque stability that is currently attainable with clinically approved MR agents, therefore opening the possibility of whole-body (including coronary) detection of unstable plaques in the future and potentially improved mitigation of cataclysmic cardiovascular events.
Authors: Chun Yuan; William S Kerwin; Marina S Ferguson; Nayak Polissar; Shaoxiong Zhang; Jianming Cai; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: William Kerwin; Andrew Hooker; Mary Spilker; Paolo Vicini; Marina Ferguson; Thomas Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marc Sirol; Vitalii V Itskovich; Venkatesh Mani; Juan Gilberto S Aguinaldo; John T Fallon; Bernd Misselwitz; Hanns-Joachim Weinmann; Valentin Fuster; Jean-François Toussaint; Zahi A Fayad Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-06-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dominik Nörenberg; Hans U Ebersberger; Gerd Diederichs; Bernd Hamm; René M Botnar; Marcus R Makowski Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Yvonne Y Bender; Andreas Pfeifer; Hans U Ebersberger; Gerd Diederichs; Peter Hoppe; Bernd Hamm; René M Botnar; Marcus R Makowski Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Lu Jiang; Tiffany R Greenwood; Erika R Amstalden van Hove; Kamila Chughtai; Venu Raman; Paul T Winnard; Ron M A Heeren; Dmitri Artemov; Kristine Glunde Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Umar Sadat; Farouc A Jaffer; Marc A M J van Zandvoort; Stephen J Nicholls; Domenico Ribatti; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-08-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eduardo Pozo; Pilar Agudo-Quilez; Antonio Rojas-González; Teresa Alvarado; María José Olivera; Luis Jesús Jiménez-Borreguero; Fernando Alfonso Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2016-09-26