Literature DB >> 19808510

Strain dyssynchrony index correlates with improvement in left ventricular volume after cardiac resynchronization therapy better than tissue velocity dyssynchrony indexes.

Chinami Miyazaki1, Grace Lin, Brian D Powell, Raul E Espinosa, Charles J Bruce, Fletcher A Miller, Barry L Karon, Robert F Rea, David L Hayes, Jae K Oh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various dyssynchrony indexes derived from tissue velocity and strain imaging have been proposed to predict the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to compare the effect of CRT on dyssynchrony indexes derived by tissue velocity and strain and to determine which baseline intraventricular dyssynchrony parameters correlate with improvement in left ventricular volume after CRT. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging was performed in 45 patients with systolic heart failure at baseline, 1 day after CRT, and a median of 6 months after CRT. We calculated septal-lateral delay and anteroseptal-posterior delay and standard deviation of time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 basal and mid-left ventricular segments (Tv-SD). The standard deviation for time to peak strain in the 12 basal and mid-left ventricular segments (Tepsilon-SD) was calculated as a strain-derived dyssynchrony index. None of the tissue velocity-derived dyssynchrony indexes improved after CRT (septal-lateral delay, P=0.39; anteroseptal-posterior delay, P=0.46; Tv-SD, P=0.30), whereas Tepsilon-SD decreased significantly after CRT (P<0.001). Improvement in Tepsilon-SD 1 day after CRT correlated with the reduction in end-systolic volume at follow-up (r=0.66; P<0.001). Baseline Tepsilon-SD demonstrated significant correlation with the reduction of end-systolic volume at follow-up (r=0.57; P<0.001); however, baseline tissue velocity-derived dyssynchrony indexes failed to predict the effect of CRT.
CONCLUSIONS: The strain-derived dyssynchrony index is a better measurement than the tissue velocity dyssynchrony index for monitoring changes in mechanical dyssynchrony after CRT and for predicting reduction in left ventricular volume after CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19808510     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.774513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  7 in total

Review 1.  Strain imaging in echocardiography: methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  Gillian C Nesbitt; Sunil Mankad; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Left bundle branch block and echocardiography in the era of CRT.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Seo; Tomoko Ishizu; Fumiko Sakamaki; Masayoshi Yamamoto; Kazutaka Aonuma
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-11-26

Review 4.  Recent advances in cardiac resynchronization therapy: echocardiographic modalities, patient selection, optimization, non-responders--all you need to know for more efficient CRT.

Authors:  Harry Pavlopoulos; Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Baseline tissue Doppler imaging-derived echocardiographic parameters and left ventricle reverse remodelling following cardiac resynchronization therapy introduction.

Authors:  Jerzy Wiliński; Danuta Czarnecka; Wiktoria Wojciechowska; Małgorzata Kloch-Badełek; Marek Jastrzębski; Bogumiła Bacior; Tomasz Sondej; Aleksander Kusiak
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Regional Strain Pattern Index-A Novel Technique to Predict CRT Response.

Authors:  Michał Orszulak; Artur Filipecki; Wojciech Wróbel; Adrianna Berger-Kucza; Witold Orszulak; Dagmara Urbańczyk-Swić; Wojciech Kwaśniewski; Edyta Płońska-Gościniak; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.