BACKGROUND: Because the process of myocardial remodelling starts before the onset of symptoms, recent heart failure (HF) guidelines place special emphasis on the detection of subclinical left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic dysfunction and the timely identification of risk factors for HF. Our goal was to describe the prevalence and determinants (risk factors) of LV diastolic dysfunction in a general population and to compare the amino terminal probrain natriuretic peptide level across groups with and without diastolic dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomly recruited population sample (n=539; 50.5% women; mean age, 52.5 years), we measured early and late diastolic peak velocities of mitral inflow (E and A), pulmonary vein flow by pulsed-wave Doppler, and the mitral annular velocities (Ea and Aa) at 4 sites by tissue Doppler imaging. A healthy subsample of 239 subjects (mean age, 43.7 years) provided age-specific cutoff limits for normal E/A and E/Ea ratios and the differences in duration between the mitral A and the reverse pulmonary vein flows during atrial systole (DeltaAd-ARd). The number of subjects in diastolic dysfunction groups 1 (impaired relaxation), 2 (elevated LV end-diastolic filling pressure), and 3 (elevated E/Ea and abnormally low E/A) were 53 (9.8%), 76 (14.1%), and 18 (3.4%), respectively. We used Delta(Ad<ARd+10) to confirm possible elevation of LV filling pressures in group 2. Compared with subjects with normal diastolic function (n=392, 72.7%), group 1 (209 versus 251 pmol/L; P=0.015) and group 2 (209 versus 275 pmol/L; P=0.0003) but not group 3 (209 versus 224 pmol/L; P=0.65) had a significantly higher adjusted NT-probrain natriuretic peptide. Higher age, body mass index, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, serum insulin, and creatinine were significantly associated with a higher risk of LV diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction in a random sample of a general population, as estimated from echocardiographic measurements, was as high as 27.3%.
BACKGROUND: Because the process of myocardial remodelling starts before the onset of symptoms, recent heart failure (HF) guidelines place special emphasis on the detection of subclinical left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic dysfunction and the timely identification of risk factors for HF. Our goal was to describe the prevalence and determinants (risk factors) of LV diastolic dysfunction in a general population and to compare the amino terminal probrain natriuretic peptide level across groups with and without diastolic dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomly recruited population sample (n=539; 50.5% women; mean age, 52.5 years), we measured early and late diastolic peak velocities of mitral inflow (E and A), pulmonary vein flow by pulsed-wave Doppler, and the mitral annular velocities (Ea and Aa) at 4 sites by tissue Doppler imaging. A healthy subsample of 239 subjects (mean age, 43.7 years) provided age-specific cutoff limits for normal E/A and E/Ea ratios and the differences in duration between the mitral A and the reverse pulmonary vein flows during atrial systole (DeltaAd-ARd). The number of subjects in diastolic dysfunction groups 1 (impaired relaxation), 2 (elevated LV end-diastolic filling pressure), and 3 (elevated E/Ea and abnormally low E/A) were 53 (9.8%), 76 (14.1%), and 18 (3.4%), respectively. We used Delta(Ad<ARd+10) to confirm possible elevation of LV filling pressures in group 2. Compared with subjects with normal diastolic function (n=392, 72.7%), group 1 (209 versus 251 pmol/L; P=0.015) and group 2 (209 versus 275 pmol/L; P=0.0003) but not group 3 (209 versus 224 pmol/L; P=0.65) had a significantly higher adjusted NT-probrain natriuretic peptide. Higher age, body mass index, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, serum insulin, and creatinine were significantly associated with a higher risk of LV diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction in a random sample of a general population, as estimated from echocardiographic measurements, was as high as 27.3%.
Authors: Ngozi C Agu; Karen McNiece Redwine; Cynthia Bell; Kathleen Marie Garcia; David S Martin; Tim S Poffenbarger; John T Bricker; Ronald J Portman; Monesha Gupta-Malhotra Journal: J Am Soc Hypertens Date: 2014-02-24
Authors: Xiaoyang Li; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Nicholas Cauwenberghs; Matthew Wheeler; Holden Maecker; Joseph C Wu; Francois Haddad; Hongjie Dai Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: P Stefan Biesbroek; Sjoerd C Heslinga; Peter M van de Ven; Mike J L Peters; Raquel P Amier; Thelma C Konings; Christopher D Maroules; Colby Ayers; Parag H Joshi; Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma; Vokko P van Halm; Albert C van Rossum; Michael T Nurmohamed; Robin Nijveldt Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2018-05-12 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Amil M Shah; Susan Cheng; Hicham Skali; Justina Wu; Judy R Mangion; Dalane Kitzman; Kunihiro Matsushita; Suma Konety; Kenneth R Butler; Ervin R Fox; Nakela Cook; Hanyu Ni; Josef Coresh; Thomas H Mosley; Gerardo Heiss; Aaron R Folsom; Scott D Solomon Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Yong Seon Choi; Ana Barbosa Marcondes de Mattos; Dan Shao; Tao Li; Miranda Nabben; Maengjo Kim; Wang Wang; Rong Tian; Stephen C Kolwicz Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 5.000