Literature DB >> 19808313

Peak cardiac power output, measured noninvasively, is a powerful predictor of outcome in chronic heart failure.

Chim C Lang1, Paula Karlin, Jennifer Haythe, Tiong K Lim, Donna M Mancini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cardiac output (CO) response to exercise and other invasively derived hemodynamic variables has been variably described to provide better prognostication than peak V(O(2)) in patients with chronic heart failure. Using noninvasive measurements of CO during exercise, we compared the prognostic value of peak CO and cardiac power to peak V(O(2)) in chronic heart failure patients. METHOD AND
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients with chronic heart failure underwent symptom limited bicycle exercise with noninvasive estimation of CO using an inert gas rebreathing method. An accurate measure of peak CO was obtained in 148 patients (85% of patients; mean age, 53+/-14 years; 80% male; left ventricular ejection fraction, 24+/-12%; ischemic etiology, 34%). Peak cardiac power was derived from the product of the peak mean arterial blood pressure and CO divided by 451. End points consisted of death, urgent heart transplant, or left ventricular assist device implantation. Duration of follow-up averaged 337+/-252 days (median, 295 days). Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. The variables analyzed included peak V(O(2)), peak CO, peak cardiac power, V(E)/V(CO(2)) slope, and V(O(2)) at anaerobic threshold. Event-free survival for the entire cohort was 83% with 5 deaths, 4 left ventricular assist device implants, and 16 urgent transplants. Peak V(O(2)) was 12.9+/-4.5 mL/kg per min, and peak cardiac power was 1.7+/-0.9 W. Peak V(O(2)), peak CO, peak cardiac power, V(E)/V(CO(2)) slope, and V(O(2)) at anaerobic threshold were predictive of outcome on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, peak cardiac power and peak CO were predictive of outcome with peak cardiac power being the most powerful independent predictor of outcome (P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Peak cardiac power, measured noninvasively, is an independent predictor of outcome that can enhance the prognostic power of peak V(O(2)) in the evaluation of patients with heart failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19808313     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.798611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  24 in total

1.  Intrathecal fentanyl blockade of afferent neural feedback from skeletal muscle during exercise in heart failure patients: Influence on circulatory power and pulmonary vascular capacitance.

Authors:  Erik H Van Iterson; Eric M Snyder; Michael J Joyner; Bruce D Johnson; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Peak cardiac power measured noninvasively with a bioreactance technique is a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Hannah Rosenblum; Stephen Helmke; Paula Williams; Sergio Teruya; Margaret Jones; Daniel Burkhoff; Donna Mancini; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Congest Heart Fail       Date:  2010-10-19

3.  A comparative evaluation of electrical velocimetry and inert gas rebreathing for the non-invasive assessment of cardiac output.

Authors:  Frederik Trinkmann; Manuel Berger; Ursula Hoffmann; Martin Borggrefe; Jens J Kaden; Joachim Saur
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Modified high-intensity interval training increases peak cardiac power output in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Shu-Chun Huang; Mei-Kuen Wong; Pyng-Jing Lin; Feng-Chun Tsai; Tieh-cheng Fu; Ming-Shien Wen; Chi-Tai Kuo; Jong-Shyan Wang
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Prognostic role of cardiac power index in ambulatory patients with advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Justin L Grodin; Wilfried Mullens; Matthias Dupont; Yuping Wu; David O Taylor; Randall C Starling; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 15.534

6.  Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Response and Predictors of Stabilization.

Authors:  Marc A Sintek; Mark Gdowski; Brian R Lindman; Michael Nassif; Kory J Lavine; Eric Novak; Richard G Bach; Scott C Silvestry; Douglas L Mann; Susan M Joseph
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 7.  Clinical Classification of Heart Failure Patients Using Cardiac Function during Exercise.

Authors:  Eric M Snyder; Erik H Van Iterson; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.230

8.  Predictors of intra-aortic balloon pump hemodynamic failure in non-acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Steven Hsu; Swetha Kambhampati; Christopher M Sciortino; Stuart D Russell; Steven P Schulman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Influence of the Metaboreflex on Pulmonary Vascular Capacitance in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Erik H Van Iterson; Eric M Snyder; Bruce D Johnson; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Relationship between bioreactance and magnetic resonance imaging stroke volumes.

Authors:  R E Perkins; K G Hollingsworth; C Eggett; G A MacGowan; M G D Bates; M I Trenell; D G Jakovljevic
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.