Literature DB >> 19808268

Effect of baseline and changes in systolic blood pressure over time on the effectiveness of valsartan in the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial.

Inder S Anand1, Thomas S Rector, Michael Kuskowski, Sabu Thomas, N J Holwerda, Jay N Cohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Valsartan improved morbidity rates in the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) despite a reduction in SBP. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the SBP-lowering effects of valsartan and its cardiovascular protective effects in this population. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Baseline measurements and changes in SBP at 4 months were related to mortality and morbidity rates. The effects of valsartan on these end points were compared in quartiles of baseline SBP with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models that included a test for interaction between the effects of valsartan treatment and baseline SBP and examined the effects of changes in SBP on the valsartan effect. The mean+/-SD baseline SBP in all patients (n=5010) was 124+/-18 mm Hg. Patients in the lowest quartile of SBP (SBP <or=110 mm Hg; mean SBP 102 mm Hg; n=940) had more severe HF and a significantly increased adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.43; P=0.02), first morbid event (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.40; P=0.001), and hospitalization for HF (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.73; P<0.001) than did patients in the upper 3 quartiles of baseline SBP (mean SBP 130 mm Hg; n=3260). Valsartan reduced SBP in patients in the upper 3 quartiles but not in patients in the lowest quartile who had a baseline SBP <110 mm Hg. Valsartan was associated with decreases in the risks of first morbid event (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.91; P=0.005) and hospitalization for HF (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79; P<0.001) in the lowest quartile that were not significantly different than the valsartan effects in the other 3 quartiles combined (first morbid event HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.02; P=0.10; and HF hospitalization HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93; P=0.006; nonsignificant interactions). The decrease in SBP from baseline to 4 months was an independent risk factor for subsequent events. When changes in SBP were added to the regression model, the effects of valsartan in the lowest quartile and in the other 3 quartiles combined did not change substantially.
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline SBP and a decrease in SBP over time were risk factors for adverse events in HF. Valsartan reduced SBP but not in the high-risk group of patients who had a baseline SBP <110 mm Hg. The beneficial effects of valsartan did not vary significantly with baseline SBP, and decreases in SBP did not counteract the beneficial effects on HF morbidity rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19808268     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.107.736975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  14 in total

Review 1.  J-shaped curve for cardiovascular mortality: systolic or diastolic blood pressure?

Authors:  Nicolás Roberto Robles; Francesco Fici; Guido Grassi
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  The problem with cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines.

Authors:  Jay N Cohn; Daniel A Duprez
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-12

3.  Rationale and study design of the MyHEART study: A young adult hypertension self-management randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Heather M Johnson; Lisa Sullivan-Vedder; KyungMann Kim; Patrick E McBride; Maureen A Smith; Jamie N LaMantia; Jennifer T Fink; Megan R Knutson Sinaise; Laura M Zeller; Diane R Lauver
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Target Doses of Heart Failure Medical Therapy and Blood Pressure: Insights From the CHAMP-HF Registry.

Authors:  Poghni A Peri-Okonny; Xiaojuan Mi; Yevgeniy Khariton; Krishna K Patel; Laine Thomas; Gregg C Fonarow; Puza P Sharma; Carol I Duffy; Nancy M Albert; Javed Butler; Adrian F Hernandez; Kevin McCague; Fredonia B Williams; Adam D DeVore; J Herbert Patterson; John A Spertus
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 12.035

5.  Hypertension - state of the art 2017.

Authors:  Linsay McCallum
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.659

6.  The Global Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) Registry. Rationale, design and objectives.

Authors:  Miguel Camafort-Babkowski; Akintunde Adeseye; Antonio Coca; Albertino Damasceno; Giovanni De Simone; Maria Dorobantu; Pardeep S Jhund; Kazuomi Kario; Takahiro Komori; Hae Young Lee; Patricio López-Jaramillo; Okechukwu Ogah; Sandosh Padmanabahn; Domingo A Pascual-Figal; Wook Bum Pyun; Nicolás Federico Renna; Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso; Osiris Valdez-Tiburcio; Fernando Stuardo Wyss-Quintana
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.012

7.  A randomized pilot study of aortic waveform guided therapy in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Barry A Borlaug; Thomas P Olson; Sahar S Abdelmoneim; Sahar Abdelmoneim Mohamed; Vojtech Melenovsky; Vincent L Sorrell; Kelly Noonan; Grace Lin; Margaret M Redfield
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 8.  Assessing Sex Differences in the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality per Increment in Systolic Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Follow-Up Studies in the United States.

Authors:  Yu-Chung Wei; Nysia I George; Ching-Wei Chang; Karen A Hicks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Systolic Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan.

Authors:  Senthil Selvaraj; Brian L Claggett; Michael Böhm; Stefan D Anker; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Faiez Zannad; Burkert Pieske; Carolyn S P Lam; Inder S Anand; Victor C Shi; Martin P Lefkowitz; John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Stable but Progressive Nature of Heart Failure: Considerations for Primary Care Physicians.

Authors:  Inder Anand
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.