Literature DB >> 19807299

Use of electronic quality of life applications in cancer research and clinical practice.

Galina Velikova1.   

Abstract

Outcome measures of cancer treatment should include measures of quality of life, in addition to survival and objective response. Electronic administration of quality of life measures has made regular monitoring of the quality of life of individual cancer patients possible and feasible. Electronic questionnaires were well accepted by patients, had good test-retest reliability and were comparable with traditional paper-and-pen methods. Several randomized studies have shown that using quality of life screening in clinical practice can facilitate patient-doctor communication, without increasing consultation time. In one study, the regular assessment of quality of life resulted in benefits for some patients, who had better well-being and emotional functioning. Research is ongoing in developing computer-adaptive questionnaires to reduce patient burden and provide a more precise measurement. Further research using randomized controlled studies is necessary before the monitoring of individual patients' quality of life is recommended for routine practice. Special attention should be paid to training physicians in using the quality of life scores.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 19807299     DOI: 10.1586/14737167.4.4.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  8 in total

Review 1.  The value of progression-free survival to patients with advanced-stage cancer.

Authors:  Lesley J Fallowfield; Anne Fleissig
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Quality of life in mental disorders: challenges for research and clinical practice.

Authors:  Heinz Katschnig
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Evaluation of point-of-care PRO assessment in clinic settings: integration, parallel-forms reliability, and patient acceptability of electronic QOL measures during clinic visits.

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Rodney L Dunn; John T Wei; James E Montie; Scott M Gilbert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Development, Testing, and Implementation of the Belgian Patient Reported Experience Measure for Pancreatic Cancer Care (PREPARE) Project: Protocol for a Multi-Method Research Project.

Authors:  Katrien Moens; Marc Peeters; Marc Van den Bulcke; Mark Leys; Melissa Horlait
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-06-06

5.  A real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following surgery: a pilot study in cancer-related surgery.

Authors:  H S Richards; J M Blazeby; A Portal; R Harding; T Reed; T Lander; K A Chalmers; R Carter; R Singhal; K Absolom; G Velikova; K N L Avery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung-heart transplant patients.

Authors:  Maria J Santana; David Feeny; Justin Weinkauf; Roland Nador; Ali Kapasi; Kathleen Jackson; Marianne Schafenacker; Dalyce Zuk; Dale Lien
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2010-09-03

Review 7.  A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting.

Authors:  Jack Chen; Lixin Ou; Stephanie J Hollis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Patient experiences of an electronic PRO tailored feedback system for symptom management following upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

Authors:  H S Richards; A Portal; K Absolom; J M Blazeby; G Velikova; K N L Avery
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.