Literature DB >> 19807268

A novel bioreactor for stimulating skeletal muscle in vitro.

Kenneth Donnelly1, Alastair Khodabukus, Andrew Philp, Louise Deldicque, Robert G Dennis, Keith Baar.   

Abstract

For over 300 years, scientists have understood that stimulation, in the form of an electrical impulse, is required for normal muscle function. More recently, the role of specific parameters of the electrical impulse (i.e., the pulse amplitude, pulse width, and work-to-rest ratio) has become better appreciated. However, most existing bioreactor systems do not permit sufficient control over these parameters. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to engineer an inexpensive muscle electrical stimulation bioreactor to apply physiologically relevant electrical stimulation patterns to tissue-engineered muscles and monolayers in culture. A low-powered microcontroller and a DC-DC converter were used to power a pulse circuit that converted a 4.5 V input to outputs of up to 50 V, with pulse widths from 0.05 to 4 ms, and frequencies up to 100 Hz (with certain operational limitations). When two-dimensional cultures were stimulated at high frequencies (100 Hz), this resulted in an increase in the rate of protein synthesis (at 12 h, control [CTL] = 5.0 + or - 0.16; 10 Hz = 5.0 + or - 0.07; and 100 Hz = 5.5 + or - 0.13 fmol/min/mg) showing that this was an anabolic signal. When three-dimensional engineered muscles were stimulated at 0.1 ms and one or two times rheobase, stimulation improved force production (CTL = 0.07 + or - 0.009; 1.25 V/mm = 0.10 + or - 0.011; 2.5 V/mm = 0.14146 + or - 0.012; and 5 V/mm = 0.03756 + or - 0.008 kN/mm(2)) and excitability (CTL = 0.53 + or - 0.022; 1.25 V/mm = 0.44 + or - 0.025; 2.5 V/mm = 0.41 + or - 0.012; and 5 V/mm = 0.60 + or - 0.021 V/mm), suggesting enhanced maturation. Together, these data show that the physiology and function of muscles can be improved in vitro using a bioreactor that allows the control of pulse amplitude, pulse width, pulse frequency, and work-to-rest ratio.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19807268     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  31 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation as a biomimicry tool for regulating muscle cell behavior.

Authors:  Samad Ahadian; Serge Ostrovidov; Vahid Hosseini; Hirokazu Kaji; Murugan Ramalingam; Hojae Bae; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Endothelial Network Formation Within Human Tissue-Engineered Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  Dacha Gholobova; Lieselot Decroix; Vicky Van Muylder; Linda Desender; Melanie Gerard; Gilles Carpentier; Herman Vandenburgh; Lieven Thorrez
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Electrical stimulation increases hypertrophy and metabolic flux in tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Alastair Khodabukus; Lauran Madden; Neel K Prabhu; Timothy R Koves; Christopher P Jackman; Deborah M Muoio; Nenad Bursac
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Electrical and Mechanical Strategies to Enable Cardiac Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Hung Cao; Bong Jin Kang; Chia-An Lee; K Kirk Shung; Tzung K Hsiai
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-05-11

Review 5.  Bioreactor design for tendon/ligament engineering.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Bruce S Gardiner; Zhen Lin; Jonas Rubenson; Thomas B Kirk; Allan Wang; Jiake Xu; David W Smith; David G Lloyd; Ming H Zheng
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 6.  Challenges and future prospects for tissue engineering in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Bertha Chen; Bhumy Dave
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Effects of acetylcholine and electrical stimulation on glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor production in skeletal muscle cells.

Authors:  John-Mary Vianney; Damon A Miller; John M Spitsbergen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Optogenetic skeletal muscle-powered adaptive biological machines.

Authors:  Ritu Raman; Caroline Cvetkovic; Sebastien G M Uzel; Randall J Platt; Parijat Sengupta; Roger D Kamm; Rashid Bashir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Ethical considerations in tissue engineering research: Case studies in translation.

Authors:  Hannah B Baker; John P McQuilling; Nancy M P King
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 10.  Use of flow, electrical, and mechanical stimulation to promote engineering of striated muscles.

Authors:  Swathi Rangarajan; Lauran Madden; Nenad Bursac
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.