Literature DB >> 19806535

[Assessment of quality of life in health services research - conceptual, methodological and structural prerequisites].

M Koller1, E A M Neugebauer, M Augustin, A Büssing, E Farin, M Klinkhammer-Schalke, W Lorenz, K Münch, C Petersen-Ewert, N von Steinbüchel, B Wieseler.   

Abstract

On July 1, 2009, the German Network for Health Services Research [Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e. V. (DNVF e. V.)] approved the Memorandum III "Methods for Health Services Research", supported by the member societies mentioned as authors and published in this Journal [Gesundheitswesen 2009; 71: 505-510]. This is an in-depth publication on "quality-of-life assessment in health services research". Within the context of the health sciences, quality of life (QL) encompasses the subjective well-being and functioning in the physical, psychological and social domains. QL informs about the aspects of health care that "actually get to the patient". QL is what patients primarily experience, what they talk about and what to a large degree affects the acceptance of health-care services and processes in the society. Therefore, QL can be considered as a highly important endpoint within health services research. The importance of the construct quality of life is also emphasised in German treaties on social law and utility analyses. This paper is the first account on the relations between health services research and the concept and assessment of QL. Our working group has specified key criteria for QL assessment within studies on health services research. (1) Assessment instruments need to comply with standard quality criteria (reliability, validity, sensitivity, interpretability) and the decision for a particular instrument has to be reasonably justified. (2) Study design and study population have to match with the scientific research question and the sample size has to be biometrically sound. (3) QL assessment including time points over the course of the study has to follow a standardized protocol. (4) Criteria for analysis and interpretation have to be prospectively specified. (5) Studies focusing on diagnostic/therapeutic issues need to specify standards for diagnostic criteria and related therapeutic interventions. Copyright Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart . New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19806535     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1239516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  26 in total

1.  [Psychometric properties of the FKS : Reliability, validity, Rasch analysis, and descriptive results of the German version of the Children's Visual Function Questionnaire].

Authors:  E Farin; M Metten; M Nagl; W A Lagrèze; C Pieh-Beisse
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  David Lohrberg; Matthias Augustin; Christine Blome
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  [Assessment of immunoglobulins in a long-term non-interventional study (SIGNS Study). Rationale, design, and methods].

Authors:  Wilhelm Kirch; Ralf Gold; Manfred Hensel; Maria Fasshauer; David Pittrow; Dörte Huscher; Marcel Reiser; Martin Stangel; Ulrich Baumann; Michael Borte
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2010-09-28

4.  [Memorandum III "methods for health services research", Part 1 [authors: H. Pfaff, G. Glaeske, E. A. M. Neugebauer, M. Schrappe] and Part 2 [authors: E. A. M. Neugebauer, A. Icks, M. Schrappe] of the Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e.V.: A summary].

Authors:  Ursula Dietrich; Kerstin Thümmler; Ursula Schütte; Michael Walter; Wilhelm Kirch
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2011-01-16

Review 5.  [Health services research in dermatology. Current status].

Authors:  N Franzke; M Augustin
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  [Quality of life in dermatology. From measurement to practical implementation].

Authors:  K Müller; S Karrer; C Apfelbacher; C Blome; M Berneburg; M Koller
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 7.  [Health services research in intensive care medicine in Germany : Status quo and future challenges exemplified by acute pulmonary failure].

Authors:  S Blecha; S Weber-Carstens; T Bein
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  [Health-related quality of life as an outcome criterion in traumatology].

Authors:  T Kohlmann; K Bahr; J Moock
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  [Quality of life and visceral surgery].

Authors:  E Bollschweiler; C Baltin; F Berlth; S P Mönig; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Reply.

Authors:  Yong Sung Kim; Suck Chei Choi
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.