INTRODUCTION: When characterizing regional cerebral gray matter differences in structural magnetic resonance images (sMRI) by voxel-based morphometry (VBM), one faces a known drawback of VBM, namely that histogram unequalization in the intensity images introduces false-positive results. METHODS: To overcome this limitation, we propose to improve VBM by a new approach (called eVBM for enhanced VBM) that takes the histogram distribution of the sMRI into account by adding a histogram equalization step within the VBM procedure. Combining this technique with two most widely used VBM software packages (FSL and SPM), we studied GM variability in a group of 62 patients with Alzheimer's disease compared to 73 age-matched elderly controls. RESULTS: The results show that eVBM can reduce the number of false-positive differences in gray matter concentration. CONCLUSION: Because it takes advantage of the properties of VBM while improving sMRI histogram distribution at the same time, the proposed method is a powerful approach for analyzing gray matter differences in sMRI and may be of value in the investigation of sMRI gray and white matter abnormalities in a variety of brain diseases.
INTRODUCTION: When characterizing regional cerebral gray matter differences in structural magnetic resonance images (sMRI) by voxel-based morphometry (VBM), one faces a known drawback of VBM, namely that histogram unequalization in the intensity images introduces false-positive results. METHODS: To overcome this limitation, we propose to improve VBM by a new approach (called eVBM for enhanced VBM) that takes the histogram distribution of the sMRI into account by adding a histogram equalization step within the VBM procedure. Combining this technique with two most widely used VBM software packages (FSL and SPM), we studied GM variability in a group of 62 patients with Alzheimer's disease compared to 73 age-matched elderly controls. RESULTS: The results show that eVBM can reduce the number of false-positive differences in gray matter concentration. CONCLUSION: Because it takes advantage of the properties of VBM while improving sMRI histogram distribution at the same time, the proposed method is a powerful approach for analyzing gray matter differences in sMRI and may be of value in the investigation of sMRI gray and white matter abnormalities in a variety of brain diseases.
Authors: G B Frisoni; C Testa; A Zorzan; F Sabattoli; A Beltramello; H Soininen; M P Laakso Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: G B Karas; E J Burton; S A R B Rombouts; R A van Schijndel; J T O'Brien; P h Scheltens; I G McKeith; D Williams; C Ballard; F Barkhof Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kim A Celone; Vince D Calhoun; Bradford C Dickerson; Alireza Atri; Elizabeth F Chua; Saul L Miller; Kristina DePeau; Doreen M Rentz; Dennis J Selkoe; Deborah Blacker; Marilyn S Albert; Reisa A Sperling Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2006-10-04 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Rachael I Scahill; Jonathan M Schott; John M Stevens; Martin N Rossor; Nick C Fox Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-04-02 Impact factor: 11.205