Literature DB >> 19806284

Hip protectors: recommendations for conducting clinical trials--an international consensus statement (part II).

I D Cameron1, S Robinovitch, S Birge, P Kannus, K Khan, J Lauritzen, J Howland, S Evans, J Minns, A Laing, P Cripton, S Derler, D Plant, D P Kiel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While hip protectors are effective in some clinical trials, many, including all in community settings, have been unable to demonstrate effectiveness. This is due partly to differences in the design and analysis. The aim of this report is to develop recommendations for subsequent clinical research.
METHODS: In November of 2007, the International Hip Protector Research Group met to address barriers to the clinical effectiveness of hip protectors. This paper represents a consensus statement from the group on recommended methods for conducting future clinical trials of hip protectors. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Consensus recommendations include the following: the use of a hip protector that has undergone adequate biomechanical testing, the use of sham hip protectors, the conduct of clinical trials in populations with annual hip fracture incidence of at least 3%, a run-in period with demonstration of adequate adherence, surveillance of falls and adherence, and the inclusion of economic analyses. Larger and more costly clinical trials are required to definitively investigate effectiveness of hip protectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19806284      PMCID: PMC5407461          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1055-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  44 in total

1.  An economic analysis of external hip protector use in ambulatory nursing facility residents.

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Santanu K Datta; David B Matchar
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  External hip protectors to prevent osteoporotic hip fractures.

Authors:  A Ekman; H Mallmin; K Michaëlsson; S Ljunghall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-08-23       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Hip fracture prevention trial using hip protectors in Japanese nursing homes.

Authors:  A Harada; M Mizuno; M Takemura; H Tokuda; H Okuizumi; N Niino
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D M Black; M Steinbuch; L Palermo; P Dargent-Molina; R Lindsay; M S Hoseyni; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Circumstances of falls resulting in hip fractures among older people.

Authors:  R Norton; A J Campbell; T Lee-Joe; E Robinson; M Butler
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Differing risk factors for falls in nursing home and intermediate-care residents who can and cannot stand unaided.

Authors:  Stephen R Lord; Lynn M March; Ian D Cameron; Robert G Cumming; Jennifer Schwarz; Jane Zochling; Jian Sheng Charles Chen; Jan Makaroff; Yih Yiow Sitoh; Tang Ching Lau; Alan Brnabic; Philip N Sambrook
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Acceptance of hip protectors for hip fracture prevention in nursing homes.

Authors:  M Hubacher; A Wettstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Risk factors for fracture following a fall among older people in residential care facilities in Australia.

Authors:  Jian Sheng Chen; Judy M Simpson; Lyn M March; Ian D Cameron; Robert G Cumming; Stephen R Lord; Markus J Seibel; Philip N Sambrook
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Randomized controlled trial of hip protectors among women living in the community.

Authors:  Yvonne F Birks; Jill Porthouse; Caroline Addie; Karen Loughney; Lucy Saxon; Mike Baverstock; Roger M Francis; David M Reid; Ian Watt; David J Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Efficacy of a hip protector to prevent hip fracture in nursing home residents: the HIP PRO randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Douglas P Kiel; Jay Magaziner; Sheryl Zimmerman; Linda Ball; Bruce A Barton; Kathleen M Brown; Judith P Stone; Dawn Dewkett; Stanley J Birge
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  12 in total

1.  Autonomy, choice, patient-centered care, and hip protectors: the experience of residents and staff in long-term care.

Authors:  Joanie Sims-Gould; Heather A McKay; Fabio Feldman; Victoria Scott; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2013-06-11

Review 2.  Emergency orthogeriatrics: concepts and therapeutic alternatives.

Authors:  Christopher R Carpenter; Michael E Stern
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  The effects of pad geometry and material properties on the biomechanical effectiveness of 26 commercially available hip protectors.

Authors:  Andrew C Laing; Fabio Feldman; Mona Jalili; Chun Ming Jimmy Tsai; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Cost-effectiveness of hip protector use on a geriatric ward in Germany: a Markov model.

Authors:  B Stollenwerk; T Bartmus; F Klug; S Stock; D Müller
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Biomechanical testing of hip protectors following the Canadian Standards Association express document.

Authors:  B E Keenan; S L Evans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Availability and use of hip protectors in residents of nursing homes.

Authors:  J Klenk; S Kurrle; U Rissmann; A Kleiner; S Heinrich; H-H König; C Becker; K Rapp
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Increasing adherence with the use of hip protectors for older people living in the community.

Authors:  I D Cameron; S Kurrle; S Quine; P Sambrook; L March; D Chan; J Stocks; K Lockwood; B Cook; F G Schaafsma
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Physical therapy approaches to reduce fall and fracture risk among older adults.

Authors:  Saija Karinkanta; Maarit Piirtola; Harri Sievänen; Kirsti Uusi-Rasi; Pekka Kannus
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 9.  Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints in long-term geriatric care.

Authors:  Ralph Möhler; Tanja Richter; Sascha Köpke; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-02-16

Review 10.  Hip protectors are cost-effective in the prevention of hip fractures in patients with high fracture risk.

Authors:  R T A L de Bot; H D Veldman; A M Witlox; L W van Rhijn; M Hiligsmann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.