Literature DB >> 19806046

Retrospective analysis of two hundred thirty-five pediatric mandibular fracture cases.

Teoman Eskitascioglu1, Irfan Ozyazgan, Atilla Coruh, Galip K Gunay, Esabil Yuksel.   

Abstract

Maxillofacial fractures are encountered less commonly during childhood period due to anatomic, social, cultural, and environmental factors. Although the incidence of all maxillofacial fractures is 1% to 15% among pediatric and adolescent patients, this rate drops to less than 1% in children below 5 years age. Two hundred thirty-five cases (<or=16 age) with mandibular fracture were evaluated retrospectively. Patients records were examined in terms of age, gender, cause of fracture, fracture localization, number of fractures, fracture pattern, accompanying injuries, applied treatment methods, and complications. Mean age of cases was 9.2 years and 165 cases were male, 70 were female. Traffic accidents as the most common etiologic cause in all ages. Falls is the second most common cause which particularly affects children above age of 2 years. All cases had 333 fractures and the most common fracture localization was parasymphysis region (34%). The other most common fracture localizations were as follows: condyle (19%), corpus (13%), dentoalveolar region (12%), angulus (11%), symphysis region (9%), and ramus (2%). There was only a single fracture line in 145 cases, 40 cases had unilateral multiple and 50 cases had bilateral fracture lines. We applied symptomatic (conservative) treatment in 20 (8%) of our cases; fracture fixation with interdental wires or closed reduction methods were employed in 122 patients. Internal fixation with open reduction (OR) was performed on 51 (22%) patients. Both closed and OR techniques were carried out in 30 (13%) patients. Pediatric mandibular fractures, which are seen less frequently compared with those of adults, require a specific and different treatment. Although mostly less invasive methods are preferred, we believe that ORs should be considered when required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19806046     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318194fdab

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  5 in total

Review 1.  Open versus closed reduction: mandibular condylar fractures in children.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07-28

2.  Pearls of mandibular trauma management.

Authors:  John C Koshy; Evan M Feldman; Chuma J Chike-Obi; Jamal M Bullocks
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Open versus closed reduction: diacapitular fractures of the mandibular condyle.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07-28

Review 4.  Closed versus open reduction of facial fractures in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Igor Pereira; Eduardo Pellizzer; Cleidiel Lemos; Sandra Moraes; Belmiro Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-01-01

5.  Functional Treatment of a Child with Extracapsular Mandibular Fracture.

Authors:  Diana Cassi; Marisabel Magnifico; Chiara Di Blasio; Mauro Gandolfini; Alberto Di Blasio
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2017-05-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.