Literature DB >> 19805928

Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children's reading and mathematical performance.

Robert Ljung1, Patrik Sörqvist, Staffan Hygge.   

Abstract

Irrelevant speech in classrooms and road traffic noise adjacent to schools have a substantial impact on children's ability to learn. Comparing the effects of different noise sources on learning may help construct guidelines for noise abatement programs. Experimental studies are important to establish dose-response relationships and to expand our knowledge beyond correlation studies. This experiment examined effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children's reading speed, reading comprehension, basic mathematics, and mathematical reasoning. A total of 187 pupils (89 girls and 98 boys), 12-13 years old, were tested in their ordinary classrooms. Road traffic noise was found to impair reading speed (P<0.01) and basic mathematics (P<0.05). No effect was found on reading comprehension or on mathematical reasoning. Irrelevant speech did not disrupt performance on any task. These findings are related to previous research on noise in schools and the implications for noise abatement guidelines are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805928     DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.56212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  10 in total

Review 1.  Noise and quality of life.

Authors:  Michael D Seidman; Robert T Standring
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Updating working memory in aircraft noise and speech noise causes different fMRI activations.

Authors:  Bjørn Saetrevik; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 3.  Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children.

Authors:  Maria Klatte; Kirstin Bergström; Thomas Lachmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-30

4.  Individual differences in distractibility: An update and a model.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2014-03-10

5.  Differences in Speech Recognition Between Children with Attention Deficits and Typically Developed Children Disappear When Exposed to 65 dB of Auditory Noise.

Authors:  Göran B W Söderlund; Elisabeth Nilsson Jobs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-29

6.  Auditory Distraction During Reading: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of a Continuing Controversy.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Julie A Kirkby; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-06-29

7.  Comparing Attention and Cognitive Function in School Children across Noise Conditions: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Soo-Young Bhang; Jaekook Yoon; Joohyun Sung; Cheolin Yoo; Changsun Sim; Changmyung Lee; Jaewon Lee; Jiho Lee
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Is Classroom Noise Always Bad for Children? The Contribution of Age and Selective Attention to Creative Performance in Noise.

Authors:  Jessica Massonnié; Cathy Jane Rogers; Denis Mareschal; Natasha Z Kirkham
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26

9.  High second-language proficiency protects against the effects of reverberation on listening comprehension.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Anders Hurtig; Robert Ljung; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2014-04

10.  How paramedics perceive internal noise in ambulance? sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) and Subjective Noise Assessment.

Authors:  Marcin Cybulski; Katarzyna Wiecheć; Marcin Zieliński; Bartosz Imre Bilski
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.