CONTEXT: A distinct pattern of selective attention deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been difficult to identify. Heterogeneity may reflect differences in underlying genetics. OBJECTIVE: To document an objective deficit of selective attention in a large sample of children with and without ADHD using spatial orienting paradigms. By stratifying samples according to the gene dosage of a risk haplotype of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1), we could determine whether genetic factors predict spatial inattention in ADHD. DESIGN: A case-control design was used. SETTING: Children with ADHD were recruited from clinics or support groups in Ireland. Typically developing children were recruited from schools in and around Dublin, Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifteen children were recruited (ADHD = 50, control = 65). Groups were matched for age but differed in estimated intelligence. INTERVENTION: Two versions of a visual spatial orienting task in which attention was directed by valid, neutral, or invalid cues to target locations. Sudden-onset peripheral cues (exogenous) and centrally presented predictive cues (endogenous) were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To isolate an attention deficit in ADHD, groups were first compared using analysis of variance on the spatial orienting tasks. Multiple regression was used to assess the main effect of DAT1 haplotype status (heterozygous vs homozygous) and the interaction of diagnosis and genotype on those variables that discriminated children with and without ADHD. RESULTS: Children with ADHD displayed deficits in reorienting attention from invalidly cued spatial locations, particularly for targets in the left visual field. DAT1 haplotype status predicted spatial reorienting deficits for left visual field targets (P = .007) but there was also a significant interaction of diagnosis and genotype (P = .02), which revealed the greatest impairment in children with ADHD homozygous for the DAT1 haplotype. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity in selective attention in ADHD can be explained by a replicated genetic risk factor for ADHD, the 10/3 DAT1 haplotype.
CONTEXT: A distinct pattern of selective attention deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been difficult to identify. Heterogeneity may reflect differences in underlying genetics. OBJECTIVE: To document an objective deficit of selective attention in a large sample of children with and without ADHD using spatial orienting paradigms. By stratifying samples according to the gene dosage of a risk haplotype of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1), we could determine whether genetic factors predict spatial inattention in ADHD. DESIGN: A case-control design was used. SETTING:Children with ADHD were recruited from clinics or support groups in Ireland. Typically developing children were recruited from schools in and around Dublin, Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifteen children were recruited (ADHD = 50, control = 65). Groups were matched for age but differed in estimated intelligence. INTERVENTION: Two versions of a visual spatial orienting task in which attention was directed by valid, neutral, or invalid cues to target locations. Sudden-onset peripheral cues (exogenous) and centrally presented predictive cues (endogenous) were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To isolate an attention deficit in ADHD, groups were first compared using analysis of variance on the spatial orienting tasks. Multiple regression was used to assess the main effect of DAT1 haplotype status (heterozygous vs homozygous) and the interaction of diagnosis and genotype on those variables that discriminated children with and without ADHD. RESULTS:Children with ADHD displayed deficits in reorienting attention from invalidly cued spatial locations, particularly for targets in the left visual field. DAT1 haplotype status predicted spatial reorienting deficits for left visual field targets (P = .007) but there was also a significant interaction of diagnosis and genotype (P = .02), which revealed the greatest impairment in children with ADHD homozygous for the DAT1 haplotype. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity in selective attention in ADHD can be explained by a replicated genetic risk factor for ADHD, the 10/3 DAT1 haplotype.
Authors: Yannis Paloyelis; Philip Asherson; Mitul A Mehta; Stephen V Faraone; Jonna Kuntsi Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Daniel P Newman; Gerard M Loughnane; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell; Mark A Bellgrove Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Dhananjay Sakrikar; Michelle S Mazei-Robison; Marc A Mergy; Nathan W Richtand; Qiao Han; Peter J Hamilton; Erica Bowton; Aurelio Galli; Jeremy Veenstra-Vanderweele; Michael Gill; Randy D Blakely Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Tinca J C Polderman; Anja C Huizink; Frank C Verhulst; Catherina E M van Beijsterveldt; Dorret I Boomsma; Meike Bartels Journal: J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2011-02
Authors: Emanuel Bubl; Michael Dörr; Alexandra Philipsen; Dieter Ebert; Michael Bach; Ludger Tebartz van Elst Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 3.240