Literature DB >> 19805652

Assessment of microcirculatory remodeling with intracoronary flow velocity and pressure measurements: validation with endomyocardial sampling in cardiac allografts.

Javier Escaned1, Alex Flores, Pablo García-Pavía, Javier Segovia, Jesús Jimenez, Paloma Aragoncillo, Clara Salas, Fernando Alfonso, Rosana Hernández, Dominick J Angiolillo, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, Camino Bañuelos, Luis Alonso-Pulpón, Carlos Macaya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary physiology techniques have been validated extensively for the assessment of epicardial stenoses but not for the lone study of coronary microcirculation. We performed a comparison between 4 intracoronary physiological indices with the actual structural microcirculatory changes documented in transplanted hearts. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 17 cardiac allograft patients without coronary stenoses, ECG, intracoronary Doppler flow velocity, and aortic pressure were digitally recorded before and during maximal hyperemia with a dedicated system. Postprocessing of data yielded 4 indices of microcirculatory status: coronary flow velocity reserve (2.13+/-0.59), instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity pressure slope (2.33+/-1.25 cm x s x (-1)mm Hg(-1)), coronary resistance index (1.65+/-0.88 mm Hg x cm(-1) x s(-1)), and coronary resistance reserve (2.36+/-0.65). Quantitative morphometry was performed in endomyocardial biopsies during the same hospital intake; arteriolar obliteration (76.57+/-6.95%) and density (2.00+/-1.22 arterioles per 1 mm(2)) and capillary density (645+/-179 capillaries per 1 mm(2)) were measured. Univariate regression analysis between intracoronary measurements and histological findings revealed that instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope correlated with arteriolar obliteration (r=0.58, P=0.014) and capillary density (r=0.60, P=0.012). Statistical adjustment revealed an independent contribution of arteriolar obliteration (beta=0.61, P=0.0009) and capillary density (beta=-0.60, P=0.0008) to instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope values, resulting in an excellent predictive model (r=0.84, P=0.0002). Coronary resistance index correlated only with capillary density (r=0.70, P=0.019). Relative indices (coronary flow velocity reserve and coronary resistance reserve) did not correlate significantly with arteriolar obliteration, capillary density, or arteriolar density.
CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary indices derived from pressure and flow, particularly instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope, appear to be superior to coronary flow velocity reserve in detecting structural microcirculatory changes. Both arteriolar obliteration and capillary rarefaction seem to influence microcirculatory hemodynamics independently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805652     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.834739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  20 in total

1.  Syndrome X and microvascular coronary dysfunction.

Authors:  C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Imaging in patients after cardiac transplantation and in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Bhanu Gupta; Dany Jacob; Randall Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Assessment of coronary microcirculation in a swine animal model.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Quantification of coronary microvascular resistance using angiographic images for volumetric blood flow measurement: in vivo validation.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 5.  Targeting the dominant mechanism of coronary microvascular dysfunction with intracoronary physiology tests.

Authors:  Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Nina van der Hoeven; Tim P van de Hoef; Julius Heemelaar; Nicola Ryan; Amir Lerman; Niels van Royen; Javier Escaned
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  The right ventricle in scleroderma (2013 Grover Conference Series).

Authors:  Paul M Hassoun
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 7.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment.

Authors:  Paolo G Camici; Giulia d'Amati; Ornella Rimoldi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  What is coronary blood flow reserve? Insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Sanjiv Kaul
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-09-07

Review 9.  ABO-compatible liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an update.

Authors:  Anthony J Demetris; Adriana Zeevi; Jacqueline G O'Leary
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 10.  Coronary microvasculopathy in heart transplantation: Consequences and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Alessandra Vecchiati; Sara Tellatin; Annalisa Angelini; Sabino Iliceto; Francesco Tona
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.