OBJECTIVES: The Increased Flow Utilizing Subcutaneously-Enabled (INFUSE)-Pediatric Rehydration Study was designed to assess efficacy, safety, and clinical utility of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)-facilitated subcutaneous rehydration in children 2 months to 10 years of age. METHODS: Patients with mild/moderate dehydration requiring parenteral treatment in US emergency departments were eligible for this phase IV, multicenter, single-arm study. They received subcutaneous injection of 1 mL rHuPH20 (150 U), followed by subcutaneous infusion of 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid over the first hour. Subcutaneous rehydration was continued as needed for up to 72 hours. Rehydration was deemed successful if it was attributed by the investigator primarily to subcutaneous fluid infusion and the child was discharged without requiring an alternative method of rehydration. RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated in 51 patients (mean age: 1.9 years; mean weight: 11.2 kg). Initial subcutaneous catheter placement was achieved with 1 attempt for 46/51 (90.2%) of patients. Rehydration was successful for 43/51 (84.3%) of patients. Five patients (9.8%) were hospitalized but deemed to be rehydrated primarily through subcutaneous therapy, for a total of 48/51 (94.1%) of patients. No treatment-related systemic adverse events were reported, but 1 serious adverse event occurred (cellulitis at infusion site). Investigators found the procedure easy to perform for 96% of patients (49/51 patients), and 90% of parents (43/48 parents) were satisfied or very satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: rHuPH20-facilitated subcutaneous hydration seems to be safe and effective for young children with mild/moderate dehydration. Subcutaneous access is achieved easily, and the procedure is well accepted by clinicians and parents.
OBJECTIVES: The Increased Flow Utilizing Subcutaneously-Enabled (INFUSE)-Pediatric Rehydration Study was designed to assess efficacy, safety, and clinical utility of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)-facilitated subcutaneous rehydration in children 2 months to 10 years of age. METHODS:Patients with mild/moderate dehydration requiring parenteral treatment in US emergency departments were eligible for this phase IV, multicenter, single-arm study. They received subcutaneous injection of 1 mL rHuPH20 (150 U), followed by subcutaneous infusion of 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid over the first hour. Subcutaneous rehydration was continued as needed for up to 72 hours. Rehydration was deemed successful if it was attributed by the investigator primarily to subcutaneous fluid infusion and the child was discharged without requiring an alternative method of rehydration. RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated in 51 patients (mean age: 1.9 years; mean weight: 11.2 kg). Initial subcutaneous catheter placement was achieved with 1 attempt for 46/51 (90.2%) of patients. Rehydration was successful for 43/51 (84.3%) of patients. Five patients (9.8%) were hospitalized but deemed to be rehydrated primarily through subcutaneous therapy, for a total of 48/51 (94.1%) of patients. No treatment-related systemic adverse events were reported, but 1 serious adverse event occurred (cellulitis at infusion site). Investigators found the procedure easy to perform for 96% of patients (49/51 patients), and 90% of parents (43/48 parents) were satisfied or very satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: rHuPH20-facilitated subcutaneous hydration seems to be safe and effective for young children with mild/moderate dehydration. Subcutaneous access is achieved easily, and the procedure is well accepted by clinicians and parents.
Authors: Gregor Cornelius Weber; Bettina Alexandra Buhren; Holger Schrumpf; Johannes Wohlrab; Peter Arne Gerber Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2019 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Sanna Rosengren; Samuel S Dychter; Marie A Printz; Lei Huang; Richard I Schiff; Hans-Peter Schwarz; John K McVey; Fred H Drake; Dan C Maneval; Don A Kennard; Gregory I Frost; Barry J Sugarman; Douglas B Muchmore Journal: AAPS J Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Bettina Alexandra Buhren; Holger Schrumpf; Norman-Philipp Hoff; Edwin Bölke; Said Hilton; Peter Arne Gerber Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 2.175
Authors: Greg J Goodman; Mark R Magnusson; Peter Callan; Stefania Roberts; Sarah Hart; Cara B McDonald; Michael Clague; Alice Rudd; Philip S Bekhor; Steven Liew; Michael Molton; Katy Wallace; Niamh Corduff; Sean Arendse; Shobhan Manoharan; Ava Shamban; Izolda Heydenrych; Ashish C Bhatia; Peter Peng; Tatjana Pavicic; Krishan Mohan Kapoor; David E Kosenko Journal: Aesthet Surg J Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 4.283
Authors: Richard L Wasserman; Isaac Melamed; Mark R Stein; Werner Engl; Marlies Sharkhawy; Heinz Leibl; Jennifer Puck; Arye Rubinstein; Lisa Kobrynski; Sudhir Gupta; Andrew J Grant; Anoshie Ratnayake; Wendell G Richmond; Joseph Church; Leman Yel; David Gelmont Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 8.317