Literature DB >> 19805400

Dual effects of superovulation: loss of maternal and paternal imprinted methylation in a dose-dependent manner.

Brenna A Market-Velker1, Liyue Zhang, Lauren S Magri, Anne C Bonvissuto, Mellissa R W Mann.   

Abstract

Superovulation or ovarian stimulation is currently an indispensable assisted reproductive technology (ART) for human subfertility/infertility treatment. Recently, increased frequencies of imprinting disorders have been correlated with ARTs. Significantly, for Angelman and Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndromes, patients have been identified where ovarian stimulation was the only procedure used by the couple undergoing ART. In many cases, increased risk of genomic imprinting disorders has been attributed to superovulation in combination with inherent subfertility. To distinguish between these contributing factors, carefully controlled experiments are required on spontaneously ovulated, in vivo-fertilized oocytes and their induced-ovulated counterparts, thereby minimizing effects of in vitro manipulations. To this end, effects of superovulation on genomic imprinting were evaluated in a mouse model, where subfertility is not a confounding issue. This work represents the first comprehensive examination of the overall effects of superovulation on imprinted DNA methylation for four imprinted genes in individual blastocyst stage embryos. We demonstrate that superovulation perturbed genomic imprinting of both maternally and paternally expressed genes; loss of Snrpn, Peg3 and Kcnq1ot1 and gain of H19 imprinted methylation were observed. This perturbation was dose-dependent, with aberrant imprinted methylation more frequent at the high hormone dosage. Superovulation is thought to primarily affect oocyte development; thus, effects were expected to be limited to maternal alleles. Our study revealed that maternal as well as paternal H19 methylation was perturbed by superovulation. We postulate that superovulation has dual effects during oogenesis, disrupting acquisition of imprints in growing oocytes, as well as maternal-effect gene products subsequently required for imprint maintenance during pre-implantation development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19805400     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddp465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  93 in total

1.  Limiting dilution bisulfite (pyro)sequencing reveals parent-specific methylation patterns in single early mouse embryos and bovine oocytes.

Authors:  Nady El Hajj; Tom Trapphoff; Matthias Linke; Andreas May; Tamara Hansmann; Juliane Kuhtz; Kurt Reifenberg; Julia Heinzmann; Heiner Niemann; Angelika Daser; Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter; Ulrich Zechner; Thomas Haaf
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.528

2.  Loss of genomic imprinting in mouse embryos with fast rates of preimplantation development in culture.

Authors:  Brenna A Market Velker; Michelle M Denomme; Mellissa R W Mann
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Primary epimutations introduced during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are corrected by germline-specific epigenetic reprogramming.

Authors:  Eric de Waal; Yukiko Yamazaki; Puraskar Ingale; Marisa Bartolomei; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; John R McCarrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Metastasis tumor antigen 2 (MTA2) is involved in proper imprinted expression of H19 and Peg3 during mouse preimplantation development.

Authors:  Pengpeng Ma; Shu Lin; Marisa S Bartolomei; Richard M Schultz
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  The cumulative effect of assisted reproduction procedures on placental development and epigenetic perturbations in a mouse model.

Authors:  Eric de Waal; Lisa A Vrooman; Erin Fischer; Teri Ord; Monica A Mainigi; Christos Coutifaris; Richard M Schultz; Marisa S Bartolomei
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  A Molecular Perspective on Procedures and Outcomes with Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Monica A Mainigi; Carmen Sapienza; Samantha Butts; Christos Coutifaris
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

7.  Superovulation alters the expression of endometrial genes critical to tissue remodeling and placentation.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Fan Wang; Teri Ord; Christos Coutifaris; Rui Feng; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Abnormal DNA Methylation of Imprinted Loci in Human Preimplantation Embryos.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Shi; Shiling Chen; Haiyan Zheng; Lele Wang; Yaqin Wu
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.060

9.  Chemically assisted enucleation results in higher G6PD expression in early bovine female embryos obtained by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Naiara Zoccal Saraiva; Clara Slade Oliveira; Tatiane Almeida Drummond Tetzner; Marina Ragagnin de Lima; Danilas Salinet de Melo; Simone Cristina Méo Niciura; Joaquim Mansano Garcia
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 1.987

10.  Generation of trophoblast stem cells.

Authors:  Michael C Golding
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.