Literature DB >> 19803990

Obstetricians and the rights of pregnant women.

Howard Minkoff1, Lynn M Paltrow.   

Abstract

At times, obstetricians are called upon to assist pregnant women in making clinical choices between options that may selectively disadvantage either the mother or the fetus. If a mother chooses a therapeutic course that disadvantages the fetus the physician may feel distressed. In this paper we argue that the choices made by mothers are almost always in the interests of the fetus, and supported by physicians. When there is disagreement it is often due to poor communication. While acknowledging that the rare circumstances in which the physician and patient wish to pursue different clinical paths can be stressful for the provider, we explain why obstetricians should accept the judgment of their patient in all instances. Finally, we will maintain that positing a choice between maternal and fetal interests is, in fact, creating a false choice, in as much as options are presented as being exclusive, when in fact that is not the case.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19803990     DOI: 10.2217/17455057.3.3.315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)        ISSN: 1745-5057


  2 in total

1.  Toward an ethically responsible approach to vaginal birth after cesarean.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Margaret Olivia Little
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Ultrasound's 'window on the womb' brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians' experiences in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Ann Lalos; Margareta Persson; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.