Literature DB >> 19802972

In-vitro studies with ceftazidime.

H Giamarellou1, A Avlami, V Matsakas, J Kosmidis, G K Daikos.   

Abstract

MIC determinations for 275 multiply-resistant nosocomial isolates of enterobacteria showed that ceftazidime was more effective than cefotaxime, cefoxitin or cephalothin. Enterobacter species were the most resistant with 12% isolates resistant to more than 8 mg/l of ceftazidime, but this was still the most active agent. Of 150 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (55% of which were resistant to gentamicin), only 9% were resistant to 8 mg/l of ceftazidime and 2% to cefsulodin, both of which were more active than cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefoperazone or moxalactam. Ceftazidime was less active than cefoxitin against Bacteroides fragilis, with 30% of strains resistant to 8 mg/l of ceftazidime, but it was more active than cefotaxime or cephalothin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 19802972     DOI: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  3 in total

1.  Multicenter study of the sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  B Wiedemann; K Machka; R Malottke
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Ceftriaxone. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  D M Richards; R C Heel; R N Brogden; T M Speight; G S Avery
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Ceftazidime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  D M Richards; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.