Literature DB >> 19802967

Ceftazidime: in-vitro antibacterial activity and susceptibility to beta-lactamases compared with that of cefotaxime, moxalactam and other beta-lactam antibiotics.

I Phillips1, C Warren, K Shannon, A King, D Hanslo.   

Abstract

The in-vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime was assessed against recent clinical isolates of common bacteria and also against reference strains that produced known beta-lactamases. The compound was active, though less so than cephaloridine against staphylococci and streptococci with MICs mostly 0.12-2 mg/l for streptococci and 8 mg/l for staphylococci, but enterococci (MICs > or =64 mg/l) and methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MICs 16-32 mg/l) were resistant. Penicillin-resistant pneumococci (MICs 2-4 mg/l) were much less sensitive than other pneumococci (MICs 0.12-0.25 mg/l). Ceftazidime was also active, but slightly less so than cefotaxime or moxalactam, against enterobacteria (MICs mostly 0.12-0.25 mg/l). Its activity was also inferior to that of cefotaxime against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (MICs mostly 0.03-0.06 mg/l) and Haemophilus influenzae (MICs mostly 0.06-0.25 mg/l). However it was about eightfold more active than cefotaxime or moxalactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MICs mostly 1-4 mg/l), and it was also more active than these compounds against other pseudomonads. Ceftazidime was less active than cefoxitin against Bacteroides spp. (MICs mostly 16-64 mg/l for Bact. fragilis and 2-8 mg/l for other bacteroides) and less active than ampicillin or cefoxitin against other anaerobes. The compound was highly resistant to hydrolysis by most beta-lactamases including OXA-1 and the enzymes from Klebsiella 1082E and Proteus vulgaris PC37 which hydrolyse cefuroxime and cefotaxime. However, it was hydrolysed slowly by the enzyme from a highly ampicillin-resistant isolate of Bact. fragilis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 19802967     DOI: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  15 in total

Review 1.  Drug treatment of pneumonia in the hospital. What are the choices?

Authors:  M Aoun; J Klastersky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue concentrations of ceftazidime in burn patients.

Authors:  R A Walstad; L Aanderud; E Thurmann-Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  In vitro antibacterial effects of cephalosporins.

Authors:  J D Williams; F Moosdeen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Comparative activity in vitro of ceftazidime and nine other antibacterial agents.

Authors:  D S Reeves; H A Holt; M J Bywater
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 5.  Modeling intraocular bacterial infections.

Authors:  Roger A Astley; Phillip S Coburn; Salai Madhumathi Parkunan; Michelle C Callegan
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  [Comparative in vitro study of the antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime against clinical isolates].

Authors:  W Klietmann; J Focht; K Nösner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 7.  Cephalosporins in gram-positive infections.

Authors:  J Symonds; A M Geddes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in patients with biliary tract disease.

Authors:  R A Walstad; J N Wiig; E Thurmann-Nielsen; T B Halvorsen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Concentrations of ceftazidime, tobramycin and ampicillin in the cerebrospinal fluid of newborn infants.

Authors:  I Tessin; B Trollfors; K Thiringer; Z Thörn; P Larsson
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Double beta-lactam regimen compared to an aminoglycoside/beta-lactam regimen as empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients.

Authors:  J H Joshi; K A Newman; B W Brown; R S Finley; R L Ruxer; M A Moody; S C Schimpff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.