BACKGROUND: The Community, Health Center, and Academic Medicine Partnership Project (CHAMPP) is a partnership between medical researchers, community health centers (CHCs), and a community advisory committee focused on reducing cardiovascular morbidity related to hypertension and diabetes for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations in Boston, Massachusetts. OBJECTIVE: We conducted site visits at seven participating CHCs, located in Boston. The visits were to solicit health center staff opinions about site-specific barriers and enabling factors for optimum preventative cardiovascular care for racial/ethnic minority patients receiving hypertension and diabetes care at their centers. METHODS: Site visits included a tour of each health center and a series of directed interviews with center personnel. Site visit notes were reviewed to identify themes that emerged during the course of each site visit. A summary matrix was developed for each health center, which included information regarding the most salient and persistent themes of the visit. RESULTS: Site visits uncovered several patient-, provider-, CHC-, and community-based factors that either facilitate or hinder optimal care of chronic disease patients. Commonly referenced barriers included the need for improved patient adherence to provider recommendations; insufficient time for providers to address complex health issues presented by patients and the need for a broader range of healthier food options in surrounding communities. Interactive patient groups and community health workers (CHWs) have been well received when implemented. CONCLUSION: Recommendations included adopting case management as a part of usual care for chronic disease patients; additionally, widespread implementation of CHWs may to provide a platform for more comprehensive care for patients.
BACKGROUND: The Community, Health Center, and Academic Medicine Partnership Project (CHAMPP) is a partnership between medical researchers, community health centers (CHCs), and a community advisory committee focused on reducing cardiovascular morbidity related to hypertension and diabetes for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations in Boston, Massachusetts. OBJECTIVE: We conducted site visits at seven participating CHCs, located in Boston. The visits were to solicit health center staff opinions about site-specific barriers and enabling factors for optimum preventative cardiovascular care for racial/ethnic minority patients receiving hypertension and diabetes care at their centers. METHODS: Site visits included a tour of each health center and a series of directed interviews with center personnel. Site visit notes were reviewed to identify themes that emerged during the course of each site visit. A summary matrix was developed for each health center, which included information regarding the most salient and persistent themes of the visit. RESULTS: Site visits uncovered several patient-, provider-, CHC-, and community-based factors that either facilitate or hinder optimal care of chronic diseasepatients. Commonly referenced barriers included the need for improved patient adherence to provider recommendations; insufficient time for providers to address complex health issues presented by patients and the need for a broader range of healthier food options in surrounding communities. Interactive patient groups and community health workers (CHWs) have been well received when implemented. CONCLUSION: Recommendations included adopting case management as a part of usual care for chronic diseasepatients; additionally, widespread implementation of CHWs may to provide a platform for more comprehensive care for patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Community-based participatory research; cardiovascular diseases; diabetes mellitus; endocrine system diseases; health disparities; health outcomes
Authors: Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: David P Faxon; Lee H Schwamm; Richard C Pasternak; Eric D Peterson; Barbara Joyce McNeil; Vincent Bufalino; Clyde W Yancy; Lawrence M Brass; David W Baker; Robert O Bonow; Lynn A Smaha; Daniel W Jones; Sidney C Smith; Gray Ellrodt; Jerilyn Allen; Sanford J Schwartz; Gregg Fonarow; Pam Duncan; Katie Horton; Renee Smith; Steve Stranne; Kenneth Shine Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: George Howard; Ron Prineas; Claudia Moy; Mary Cushman; Martha Kellum; Ella Temple; Andra Graham; Virginia Howard Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-03-23 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Truls Østbye; Kimberly S H Yarnall; Katrina M Krause; Kathryn I Pollak; Margaret Gradison; J Lloyd Michener Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Sandy Cook; Melinda L Drum; Anne C Kirchhoff; Lei Jin; Jessica Levie; James F Harrison; Susan A Lippold; Cynthia T Schaefer; Marshall H Chin Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2006-02
Authors: Beverley E Russell; Edith Gurrola; Chima D Ndumele; Bruce E Landon; James A O'Malley; Tom Keegan; John Z Ayanian; Leroi S Hicks Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: John Eaton; Darcy Reed; Kurt B Angstman; Kris Thomas; Frederick North; Robert Stroebel; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; Rajeev Chaudhry Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 2.431