Literature DB >> 19802038

Effect of intensification of pastoral farming on greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand.

C S Pinares-Patino1, G C Waghorn, R S Hegarty, S O Hoskin.   

Abstract

In 2007, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in New Zealand were 16% higher than in 1990. Agriculture accounts for 48% of GHG emissions in New Zealand, and 10-12% of emissions in most other 'developed' countries. Methane (CH4) accounts for 35% of GHG emissions in New Zealand, mostly from ruminal fermentation. Nitrous oxide (N2O) accounts for 17% of GHG emissions in New Zealand, mostly from urinary N, exacerbated by excessive application of nitrogenous fertiliser. GHG are often expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-e), and 1 kg CH4 has a similar global-warming potential as 21 kg CO2, whilst 1 kg N2O has the same warming potential as 310 kg CO2. Methane is derived from H2 produced during ruminal fermentation, and losses account for 6-7% of gross energy in feeds. This is about 9-10% of metabolisable energy intake. Methane production tends to be lower when legumes, rather than grasses, are fed, and emissions are greater (per kg dry matter intake; DMI) when mature grasses and silages are fed. There are small differences between individual animals in their CH4 production (g/kg DMI) but there are few profitable options available for reducing CH4 production in ruminants. Emissions of N2O can be reduced by more strategic application of nitrogenous fertiliser, avoidance of waterlogged areas, and use of dicyandiamide in some cooler regions. GHG mitigation should be based on life-cycle analyses to ensure a reduction in one GHG does not increase another. Current and future strategies are unlikely to reduce GHG emissions by >20%. Food production is central to human survival, and should not be compromised to mitigate GHG emissions. Efforts should be directed toward increasing animal efficiency and reducing GHG emissions/unit edible food.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19802038     DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2009.58618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Vet J        ISSN: 0048-0169            Impact factor:   1.628


  5 in total

1.  New Zealand Dairy Farming: Milking Our Environment for All Its Worth.

Authors:  Kyleisha J Foote; Michael K Joy; Russell G Death
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Enteric Methane Emissions and Animal Performance in Dairy and Beef Cattle Production: Strategies, Opportunities, and Impact of Reducing Emissions.

Authors:  Byeng-Ryel Min; Seul Lee; Hyunjung Jung; Daniel N Miller; Rui Chen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Is the Grass Always Greener? Comparing the Environmental Impact of Conventional, Natural and Grass-Fed Beef Production Systems.

Authors:  Judith L Capper
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database.

Authors:  Mutian Niu; Ermias Kebreab; Alexander N Hristov; Joonpyo Oh; Claudia Arndt; André Bannink; Ali R Bayat; André F Brito; Tommy Boland; David Casper; Les A Crompton; Jan Dijkstra; Maguy A Eugène; Phil C Garnsworthy; Md Najmul Haque; Anne L F Hellwing; Pekka Huhtanen; Michael Kreuzer; Bjoern Kuhla; Peter Lund; Jørgen Madsen; Cécile Martin; Shelby C McClelland; Mark McGee; Peter J Moate; Stefan Muetzel; Camila Muñoz; Padraig O'Kiely; Nico Peiren; Christopher K Reynolds; Angela Schwarm; Kevin J Shingfield; Tonje M Storlien; Martin R Weisbjerg; David R Yáñez-Ruiz; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Benefits and Trade-Offs of Dairy System Changes Aimed at Reducing Nitrate Leaching.

Authors:  Pierre Beukes; Alvaro Romera; Kathryn Hutchinson; Tony van der Weerden; Cecile de Klein; Dawn Dalley; David Chapman; Chris Glassey; Robyn Dynes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.