Literature DB >> 19801208

A prospective evaluation of psychosocial outcomes following ear reconstruction with rib cartilage in microtia.

Armin Steffen1, Barbara Wollenberg, Inke R König, Henning Frenzel.   

Abstract

Little is known about the psychosocial improvement of microtic patients following reconstruction with rib cartilage. Furthermore, no data exist on detailed follow-ups of patients who refused ear repair. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a prospective evaluation of psychosocial outcomes with a validated instrument in ear reconstruction with rib cartilage. Twenty-one patients, who had undergone rib-cartilage reconstruction to treat a congenital auricular defect, were evaluated prospectively for psychosocial changes using a clinically validated questionnaire. In addition, patients were asked to judge the new auricle and thoracic scar. Twenty-three patients, who decided against an ear reconstruction following consultation, were analysed for the reasons behind their refusal. Almost 66% of the treated patients were able to integrate the new ear into their body concept. If faced with the same surgery decision again, 88% would still choose to undergo ear reconstruction with rib cartilage. There were strong postoperative improvements in psychosocial attitude (p=0.02). In our sample, patients who declined ear repair showed higher values of psychosocial attitude (p=0.006) compared with the preoperative results in treated patients. Our study shows that the clinically known improvement of psychosocial aspects can be documented by a validated psychological test. The patient's expectations and surgical limits of the reconstruction with rib cartilage need detailed discussion prior to surgery to prevent dissatisfaction despite surgical success. Our data help to accept a child's denial as these patients have a good psychosocial standing even with an unrepaired microtia. Copyright 2009 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19801208     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  14 in total

1.  [Psychometric evaluation in severe ear deformities: critical analysis of the current situation].

Authors:  A Steffen; H Frenzel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Microtia: epidemiology and genetics.

Authors:  Daniela V Luquetti; Carrie L Heike; Anne V Hing; Michael L Cunningham; Timothy C Cox
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 3.  The role of 3D printing in treating craniomaxillofacial congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; David B Demissie; Simon Young; Bruce N Cronstein; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 4.  Otologic and Audiology Concerns of Microtia Repair.

Authors:  Kausar Ali; Kriti Mohan; Yi-Chun Liu
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Microtia Reconstruction.

Authors:  Randall A Bly; Amit D Bhrany; Craig S Murakami; Kathleen C Y Sie
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.918

Review 6.  Auricular reconstruction via 3D bioprinting strategies: An update.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Pradeep Kumar Yadav; Rahul Pandey; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 7.  Auricular reconstruction from rib to 3D printing.

Authors:  Chelsea L Reighard; Scott J Hollister; David A Zopf
Journal:  J 3D Print Med       Date:  2017-12-15

8.  Clinical efficacy of modified total auricular reconstruction technique by using reformative inflation method and remnant ear without skin grafting.

Authors:  Yingyi Zhang; Chuanqi Liu; Shiyou Wei; Guonian Zhu; Zhengyong Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

9.  Deletion of a conserved regulatory element required for Hmx1 expression in craniofacial mesenchyme in the dumbo rat: a newly identified cause of congenital ear malformation.

Authors:  Lely A Quina; Takashi Kuramoto; Daniela V Luquetti; Timothy C Cox; Tadao Serikawa; Eric E Turner
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.758

10.  Behavioral Adjustment of Preschool Children With and Without Craniofacial Microsomia.

Authors:  Alexis L Johns; Erin R Wallace; Brent R Collett; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Amelia F Drake; Carrie L Heike; Sara L Kinter; Daniela V Luquetti; Leanne Magee; Susan Norton; Kathleen Sie; Matthew L Speltz
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.