UNLABELLED: Soer R, van der Schans CP, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Reneman MF. Normative values for a functional capacity evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To establish normative values for a functional capacity evaluation (FCE) of healthy working subjects. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy working subjects (N=701; 448 men, 253 women) between 20 and 60 years of age, working in more than 180 occupations. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects performed a 2-hour FCE consisting of 12 work-related tests. Subjects were classified into categories based on physical demands according to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Means, ranges, SDs, and percentiles were provided for normative values of FCE, and a regression analysis for outcome of the 12 tests was performed. RESULTS: Normative FCE values were established for 4 physical demand categories. CONCLUSIONS: The normative values enable comparison of patients' performances to these values. If a patient's performance exceeds the lowest scores in his/her corresponding demand category, then the patient's capacity is very likely to be sufficient to meet the workload. Further, clinicians can make more precise return-to-work recommendations and set goals for rehabilitation programs. A comparison of the normative values can be useful to the fields of rehabilitation, occupational, and insurance medicine. Further research is needed to test the validity of the normative values with respect to workplace assessments and return-to-work recommendations.
UNLABELLED: Soer R, van der Schans CP, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Reneman MF. Normative values for a functional capacity evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To establish normative values for a functional capacity evaluation (FCE) of healthy working subjects. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy working subjects (N=701; 448 men, 253 women) between 20 and 60 years of age, working in more than 180 occupations. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects performed a 2-hour FCE consisting of 12 work-related tests. Subjects were classified into categories based on physical demands according to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Means, ranges, SDs, and percentiles were provided for normative values of FCE, and a regression analysis for outcome of the 12 tests was performed. RESULTS: Normative FCE values were established for 4 physical demand categories. CONCLUSIONS: The normative values enable comparison of patients' performances to these values. If a patient's performance exceeds the lowest scores in his/her corresponding demand category, then the patient's capacity is very likely to be sufficient to meet the workload. Further, clinicians can make more precise return-to-work recommendations and set goals for rehabilitation programs. A comparison of the normative values can be useful to the fields of rehabilitation, occupational, and insurance medicine. Further research is needed to test the validity of the normative values with respect to workplace assessments and return-to-work recommendations.
Authors: L W Pas; P P F M Kuijer; H Wind; J K Sluiter; J W Groothoff; S Brouwer; M H W Frings-Dresen Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: H J Bieleman; R Stewart; M F Reneman; W M van Ittersum; C P van der Schans; K W Drossaers-Bakker; F G J Oosterveld Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2019-09
Authors: D Boersma; O Demontiero; Z Mohtasham Amiri; S Hassan; H Suarez; D Geisinger; P Suriyaarachchi; A Sharma; G Duque Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Monika E Finger; Andrea Glässel; Peter Erhart; Felix Gradinger; Andreas Klipstein; Gilles Rivier; Maria Schröer; Christian Wenk; Hans Peter Gmünder; Gerold Stucki; Reuben Escorpizo Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2011-06
Authors: Y R Huo; P Suriyaarachchi; F Gomez; C L Curcio; D Boersma; P Gunawardene; O Demontiero; G Duque Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: H J Bieleman; M W van Ittersum; J W Groothoff; J C M Oostveen; F G J Oosterveld; C P van der Schans; R Soer; M F Reneman Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2010-05-21 Impact factor: 3.015