Literature DB >> 19801035

Impact of pre- and postprocedural mitral regurgitation on outcomes after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty for mitral stenosis.

Hani Jneid1, Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez, María Sanchez-Ledesma, Andrew O Maree, Roberto J Cubeddu, Milton L Leon, Pablo Rengifo-Moreno, Juan Pal Otero, Ignacio Inglessis, Pedro L Sanchez, Igor F Palacios.   

Abstract

Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV) is an effective therapy in patients with significant mitral stenosis. Few studies have examined the effect of mitral regurgitation (MR), a frequent periprocedural finding, on PMV outcomes. We examined the effects of pre- and postprocedural MR after PMV. Contrast left ventriculography was performed before and after PMV, and the MR severity was assessed using Sellers' classification. Clinical, hemodynamic, and morphologic variables were collected for all patients. Consecutive patients (n = 876) undergoing a first PMV procedure at a single tertiary center were evaluated. An increasing preprocedural MR severity was associated with reduced PMV success (no MR, 75%; 1+ MR, 65%; 2+ MR, 44%; p <0.0001), increased in-hospital mortality (0.6% vs 2.8% vs 4.9%, respectively; p = 0.007), and other complications. Increasing grades of pre- and postprocedural MR predicted, independently and in a grade-dependent manner, the composite outcome of mortality, mitral valve surgery, or redo PMV (preprocedural MR >or=1+, relative risk [RR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 1.8; preprocedural MR >or=2+, RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.4; postprocedural MR >or=1+, RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0; postprocedural MR >or=2+, RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.7 to 2.7; and postprocedural MR >or=3+, RR 4.6, 95% CI 3.4 to 6.2, respectively). In conclusion, increasing pre- and postprocedural MR grades independently predicted the long-term clinical outcomes after PMV. Patients with moderate preprocedural MR, in particular, appeared to have suboptimal short- and long-term outcomes, necessitating careful monitoring and early referral for mitral valve surgery, when appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19801035     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty using echocardiographic intercommissural diameter as reference for balloon sizing: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Sanati; Ali Zahedmehr; Farshad Shakerian; Hooman Bakhshandeh; Ata Firoozi; Reza Kiani; Anita Sadeghpour; Einollah Asgharnedjad; Akram Mikaelpour; Maryam Nabati
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Mitral Regurgitation After Percutaneous Mitral Valvuloplasty: Insights Into Mechanisms and Impact on Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Maria Carmo P Nunes; Robert A Levine; Renato Braulio; Marcelo A Pascoal-Xavier; Sammy Elmariah; Nayana F A Gomes; Juliana R Soares; William A M Esteves; Xin Zeng; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Livia S A Passos; Luiz G Passaglia; Victor T Ribeiro; Cláudio L Gelape; Paulo H N Costa; Lucas Lodi-Junqueira; Walderez Dutra; Timothy C Tan; Elena Aikawa; Judy Hung
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-16

3.  Comparison of two different techniques for balloon sizing in percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty: which is preferable?

Authors:  Ahmet Tastan; Ali Ozturk; Omer Senarslan; Erdem Ozel; Samet Uyar; Emin Evren Ozcan; Omer Kozan
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 1.167

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.