Literature DB >> 19800588

Quantifying radiation safety and quality in medical imaging, part 3: the quality assurance scorecard.

Bruce I Reiner1.   

Abstract

The practice of medical imaging is fraught with inconsistency as it relates to quality assurance, which is due in part to the lack of standardization and objective quality-centric data. By applying the scientific methods of Shewhart and Deming to medical imaging quality assessment, one can devise an objective, data-driven quality model, encompassing the various steps and processes that take place within the medical imaging chain. Through automated recording, tracking, and analysis of these quality data elements, a quantitative scorecard can be derived that provides an objective measure of quality performance, relating to each individual process, participating stakeholder, and technology being used. Through meta-analysis of these quality-centric data, best practice guidelines can be created, which in turn promote quality as the major differentiating feature of service providers.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19800588     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

1.  Application of innovation economics to medical imaging and information systems technologies.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Matthew McKinley
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Nuclear medicine: what kind of quality would we want if we were the patient?

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani; Angelo Del Sole
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis part 3: creation of a standardized image-centric mark-up and annotation tool.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis. Part 4: quality analytics.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Improving healthcare delivery through patient informatics and quality centric data.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Innovating through measurement.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis. Part 2: medical imaging accreditation.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  Transforming health care service delivery and provider selection.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Performance indicators for radiation protection management: suggestions from the European Society of Radiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-12-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.