Literature DB >> 19800105

Thromboembolic complications of sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries.

Jennifer T Anger1, Aviva E Weinberg, John L Gore, Qin Wang, Chris L Pashos, Michael J Leonardi, Larissa V Rodríguez, Mark S Litwin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of thromboembolic complications after sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older.
METHODS: We analyzed the 1999-2001 Medicare public use files provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on a 5% national random sample of beneficiaries. Women undergoing sling procedures from January 1, 1999 to July 31, 2000 were identified by the Physicians Current Procedural Terminology Coding System (4th edition) codes and tracked for 12 months. Diagnoses of postoperative thromboembolism were identified with International Classification of Diseases (9th revision) codes. Multivariate analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for developing a thromboembolic event.
RESULTS: A total of 1356 slings were performed on patients in the 5% sample of female Medicare beneficiaries during the 18-month index period. Concomitant prolapse surgery was performed in 467 (34.4%) cases. At 3 months after surgery, thromboembolic complications had occurred in 0.9% women undergoing a sling alone and in 2.2% women undergoing concomitant prolapse surgery (P = .05). Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant prolapse surgery was associated with nearly 3 times the odds of thromboembolic complications (odds ratio 2.86, 95% confidence interval 1.10-7.45).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a low rate of thromboembolism after an isolated sling procedure. However, we found an increased rate of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among women undergoing sling surgery with prolapse repair, which emphasizes the need for appropriate deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in this patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19800105      PMCID: PMC3152375          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  21 in total

1.  Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid?

Authors:  A G Lawthers; E P McCarthy; R B Davis; L E Peterson; R H Palmer; L I Iezzoni
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Treatment of deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Jeffrey S Ginsberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Variations in use of imaging in a national sample of men with early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Chris L Pashos; James M Henning; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Natural history of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  V V Kakkar; C T Howe; C Flanc; M B Clarke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1969-08-02       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The incidence of deep vein thrombosis after prostatectomy.

Authors:  M E Mayo; T Halil; N L Browse
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1971-12

6.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: adherence to the 1995 American College of Chest Physicians consensus guidelines for surgical patients.

Authors:  M A Stratton; F A Anderson; H I Bussey; J Caprini; A Comerota; S T Haines; D W Hawkins; M B O'Connell; R C Smith; K A Stringer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-02-14

7.  A nationwide charge comparison of the principal treatments for early stage prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  J Brandeis; C L Pashos; J M Henning; M S Litwin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors:  William H Geerts; Graham F Pineo; John A Heit; David Bergqvist; Michael R Lassen; Clifford W Colwell; Joel G Ray
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  Michael E Albo; Holly E Richter; Linda Brubaker; Peggy Norton; Stephen R Kraus; Philippe E Zimmern; Toby C Chai; Halina Zyczynski; Ananias C Diokno; Sharon Tennstedt; Charles Nager; L Keith Lloyd; MaryPat FitzGerald; Gary E Lemack; Harry W Johnson; Wendy Leng; Veronica Mallett; Anne M Stoddard; Shawn Menefee; R Edward Varner; Kimberly Kenton; Pam Moalli; Larry Sirls; Kimberly J Dandreo; John W Kusek; Leroy M Nyberg; William Steers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Karen F Gold; Chris L Pashos; Shilpa S Mehta; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.