Literature DB >> 19799048

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology: an update.

P Casale1, Y Kojima.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic procedures for urological diseases in children, such as nephrectomy, pyeloplasty and orchiopexy, have proven to be safe and effective with outcome comparable to the open procedure. However, main drawback has been the relatively steep learning curve for this procedure because of technical difficulties of suturing and anastomosis. More recently, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) has gained enormous popularity in adult urology and is increasingly being adopted around the world; however, few pediatric urology series have been reported. RAS has several advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery, with the main advantage being simplification and precision of exposure and suturing because of allowing movements of the robotic arm in real time with increased degree of freedom and magnified 3-dimentional view. These features render RAS ideal for complex reconstructive surgery in a pediatric urological population. This review discusses the role of RAS in pediatric urology, and provides some technical aspects of RAS and a critical summary of current knowledge on its indications and outcome. Almost all operations that are classically performed as open or conventional laparoscopic reconstructive surgery for children with urological anomalies could be replaced by RAS, which may be established as an alternative minimally invasive surgery in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19799048     DOI: 10.1177/145749690909800206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Surg        ISSN: 1457-4969            Impact factor:   2.360


  6 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic reconstructive surgery in the lower urinary tract.

Authors:  Mohan S Gundeti; Yoshiyuki Kojima; Nobuhiro Haga; Kyle Kiriluk
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Hidden incision endoscopic surgery (HIdES) trocar placement for pediatric robotic pyeloplasty: comparison to traditional port placement.

Authors:  Yaejee H Hong; W Robert DeFoor; Pramod P Reddy; Marion Schulte; Eugene A Minevich; Brian A VanderBrink; Paul H Noh
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-03-14

3.  Paediatric computer-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Magnus Anderberg; Christina Clementson Kockum; Einar Arnbjörnsson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Current trends in pediatric minimally invasive urologic surgery.

Authors:  Dennis J Lee; Philip H Kim; Chester J Koh
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-02-18

5.  Initial experience of complete laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy combined with transvesical laparoscopic excision of distal ureter in patients with upper urinary tract cancer.

Authors:  Makito Miyake; Nobutaka Nishimura; Katsuya Aoki; Chihiro Ohmori; Takuto Shimizu; Takuya Owari; Shunta Hori; Yosuke Morizawa; Daisuke Gotoh; Yasushi Nakai; Satoshi Anai; Kazumasa Torimoto; Nobumichi Tanaka; Kiyohide Fujimoto
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 6.  Robot-assisted ureteroureterostomy in pediatric patients: current perspectives.

Authors:  Jonathan S Ellison; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.