Literature DB >> 19797568

The reliability of nonreconstructed computerized tomographic scans of the abdomen and pelvis in detecting thoracolumbar spine injuries in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status.

Micah W Smith1, J D Reed, R Facco, T Hlaing, Alan McGee, B Matthew Hicks, Mary Aaland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computerized tomography, traditionally utilized to evaluate and detect visceral abdominal and pelvic injuries in multiply injured patients with altered mental status, also has been useful for detecting thoracolumbar spine fractures and dislocations. The purpose of the present study was to test the reliability of nonreconstructed computerized tomography of the abdomen and pelvis as a screening tool for thoracolumbar spine injuries in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status.
METHODS: The study consisted of fifty-nine consecutive patients with altered mental status who were admitted to a Level-II trauma center. Each patient had a nonreconstructed computerized tomographic scan of the abdomen and pelvis (5-mm slices), and of the chest when indicated, as well as anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine. Reconstructed computerized tomographic scans dedicated to the spine (< or =2-mm slices) were completed. With use of the reconstructions as the gold standard, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the diagnostic accuracy of using the nonreconstructed computerized tomographic scans and the radiographs.
RESULTS: Reconstructions of the spine detected seventy-two thoracolumbar spine fractures, whereas nonreconstructed computerized tomographic scans of the abdomen and pelvis detected fifty-eight and those of the chest detected sixteen. With use of the reconstructions as the standard, computerized tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis had a sensitivity of 89% (95% confidence interval, 65% to 96%) and a specificity of 85% (95% confidence interval, 65% to 96%) for the detection of all fractures, compared with 37% and 76% for plain radiographs, respectively. Computerized tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was 100% sensitive and specific for the detection of whether a patient had any fracture at all, whereas radiographs were 54% sensitive and 86% specific. No fractures that were missed on nonreconstructed computerized tomography required surgery or other interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonreconstructed computerized tomography detected fractures of the thoracolumbar spine more accurately than plain radiographs did and is recommended for the diagnosis of thoracolumbar spine fractures in acute trauma patients with altered mental status. Reconstructions do not need to be ordered unless an abnormality that is found on the nonreconstructed computerized tomographic scan needs additional elucidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19797568     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  Reformatted images of the thoracic and lumbar spine following CT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis in the setting of blunt trauma: are they necessary?

Authors:  Britton Carter; Brent Griffith; Feras Mossa-Basha; Stephen A Zintsmaster; Suresh Patel; Todd R Williams; Pat Patton; Phyllis A Vallee
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-02-10

2.  Cortical shell unwrapping for vertebral body abnormality detection on computed tomography.

Authors:  Jianhua Yao; Joseph E Burns; Hector Muñoz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Imaging of the thoracic and lumbar spine in a high volume level 1 trauma center: are reformatted images of the spine essential for screening in blunt trauma?

Authors:  Aleksandr Rozenberg; Jonathan C Weinstein; Adam E Flanders; Pranshu Sharma
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-09-23

4.  A missed injury leading to delayed diagnosis and postoperative infection of an unstable thoracic spine fracture - case report of a potentially preventable complication.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshihara; Todd F Vanderheiden; Philip F Stahel
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2011-10-14

Review 5.  Thoracolumbar fractures without neurological impairment: A review of diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  G Vilà-Canet; A García de Frutos; A Covaro; M T Ubierna; E Caceres
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

Review 6.  Primary Imaging Test for Suspected Traumatic Thoracolumbar Spine Injury: 2017 Guidelines by the Korean Society of Radiology and National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency.

Authors:  Guen Young Lee; Ji Young Hwang; Na Ra Kim; Yusuhn Kang; Miyoung Choi; Jimin Kim; Eun Ju Ha; Jung Hwan Baek
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Detection of vertebral body fractures based on cortical shell unwrapping.

Authors:  Jianhua Yao; Joseph E Burns; Hector Munoz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.