BACKGROUND: Appropriate scale validity and internal consistency reliability have recently been documented for the new thyroid-specific quality of life (QoL) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for benign thyroid disorders, the ThyPRO. However, before clinical use, clinical validity and test-retest reliability should be evaluated. AIM: To investigate clinical ('known-groups') validity and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the ThyPRO. METHODS: For each of the 13 ThyPRO scales, we defined groups expected to have high versus low scores ('known-groups'). The clinical validity (known-groups validity) was evaluated by whether the ThyPRO scales could detect expected differences in a cross-sectional study of 907 thyroid patients. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by intra-class correlations of two responses to the ThyPRO 2 weeks apart in a subsample of 87 stable patients. RESULTS: On all 13 ThyPRO scales, we found substantial and significant differences between the groups expected to have high versus low scores. Test-retest reliability was above 0.70 (range 0.77-0.89) for all scales, which is usually considered necessary for comparisons among patient groups, but below 0.90, which is the usual threshold for use in individual patients. CONCLUSION: We found support for the clinical validity of the new thyroid-specific QoL questionnaire, ThyPRO, and evidence of good test-retest reliability. The questionnaire is now ready for use in clinical studies of patients with thyroid diseases.
BACKGROUND: Appropriate scale validity and internal consistency reliability have recently been documented for the new thyroid-specific quality of life (QoL) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for benign thyroid disorders, the ThyPRO. However, before clinical use, clinical validity and test-retest reliability should be evaluated. AIM: To investigate clinical ('known-groups') validity and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the ThyPRO. METHODS: For each of the 13 ThyPRO scales, we defined groups expected to have high versus low scores ('known-groups'). The clinical validity (known-groups validity) was evaluated by whether the ThyPRO scales could detect expected differences in a cross-sectional study of 907 thyroid patients. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by intra-class correlations of two responses to the ThyPRO 2 weeks apart in a subsample of 87 stable patients. RESULTS: On all 13 ThyPRO scales, we found substantial and significant differences between the groups expected to have high versus low scores. Test-retest reliability was above 0.70 (range 0.77-0.89) for all scales, which is usually considered necessary for comparisons among patient groups, but below 0.90, which is the usual threshold for use in individual patients. CONCLUSION: We found support for the clinical validity of the new thyroid-specific QoL questionnaire, ThyPRO, and evidence of good test-retest reliability. The questionnaire is now ready for use in clinical studies of patients with thyroid diseases.
Authors: Jacqueline Jonklaas; Antonio C Bianco; Andrew J Bauer; Kenneth D Burman; Anne R Cappola; Francesco S Celi; David S Cooper; Brian W Kim; Robin P Peeters; M Sara Rosenthal; Anna M Sawka Journal: Thyroid Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Martin Feller; Marieke Snel; Elisavet Moutzouri; Douglas C Bauer; Maria de Montmollin; Drahomir Aujesky; Ian Ford; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Patricia M Kearney; Simon Mooijaart; Terry Quinn; David Stott; Rudi Westendorp; Nicolas Rodondi; Olaf M Dekkers Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: F Hubertus Schmitz-Winnenthal; Simon Schimmack; Ben Lawrence; Uwe Maier; Miriam Heidmann; Markus W Buchler; Moritz von Frankenberg Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: D Gallo; E Piantanida; G Veronesi; A Lai; L Sassi; V Lombardi; E Masiello; P Premoli; E Bianconi; C Cusini; S Rosetti; M L Tanda; A Toniolo; M Ferrario; L Bartalena Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-04-22 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Elise I Klaver; Hannah C M van Loon; Riejanne Stienstra; Thera P Links; Joost C Keers; Ido P Kema; Anneke C Muller Kobold; Melanie M van der Klauw; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel Journal: Thyroid Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 6.568