Literature DB >> 19797413

Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics.

Boonlert Kukiattrakoon1, Buncha Samruajbenjakul.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of various ceramic bracket base designs bonded to glazed aluminous (Vitadur Alpha) and fluorapatite (IPS e.max Ceram) ceramics, to examine the mode of failure, and to determine the debonding characteristics of the brackets and the ceramic surfaces after bond failure. Forty ceramic discs (15 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm thick) of each ceramic were prepared and divided into four equal groups. Ten pieces of each group of different bracket bases (beads, Inspire Ice; large round pits, Crystalline IV; and irregular base, Clarity) and one group of stainless steel brackets (Optimesh XRT, control) were bonded to glazed ceramics under a 200 g load. All specimens were then subjected to SBS evaluation using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.2 mm per minute. The data were analysed using analysis of variance and Tukey's test at a significance level of 0.05. The mode of failure was examined under a stereomicroscope. The results demonstrated that for Vitadur Alpha and IPS e.max Ceram, the highest SBS were found with Inspire Ice (25.1 +/- 2.6 and 24.9 +/- 2.1 MPa) and were significantly different than Crystalline IV (21.6 +/- 1.1 and 20.9 +/- 1.5 MPa), Clarity (19.6 +/- 1.5 and 19.3 +/- 2.3 MPa), and Optimesh XRT (14.9 +/- 1.3 and 15.3 +/- 2.2 MPa; P < 0.05). Inspire Ice and Crystalline IV had 100 per cent adhesive failure while Clarity and Optimesh XRT had combination failure. The various base designs gave different SBS, but the SBS of all base designs could withstand normal orthodontic force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19797413     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  7 in total

1.  Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets with Different Base Designs: Comparative In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Mohd Younus Ansari; Deepak K Agarwal; Ankur Gupta; Preeti Bhattacharya; Juhi Ansar; Ravi Bhandari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

2.  Effect of a DPSS laser on the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with different base designs.

Authors:  Mi-Gyoung Park; Jung-Hoon Ro; Jeong-Kil Park; Ching-Chang Ko; Yong Hoon Kwon
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material.

Authors:  Shaymaa E Elsaka
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 4.  Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gursimrit K Grewal Bach; Ysidora Torrealba; Manuel O Lagravère
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Quantitative analysis of mechanically retentive ceramic bracket base surfaces with a three-dimensional imaging system.

Authors:  Da-Young Kang; Sung-Hwan Choi; Jung-Yul Cha; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Shear bond strength of ceramic and metal brackets bonded to enamel using color-change adhesive.

Authors:  Mohadeseh Delavarian; Farshad Rahimi; Ramin Mohammadi; Mohammad Moslem Imani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

7.  A novel customized ceramic bracket for esthetic orthodontics: in vitro study.

Authors:  Liu Yang; Guangfu Yin; Xiaoming Liao; Xing Yin; Niansong Ye
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.750

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.