Literature DB >> 19797410

Maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition: rapid or semi-rapid?

Sabri Ilhan Ramoglu1, Zafer Sari.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and semi-rapid maxillary expansion (SRME) in the mixed dentition period. The SRME group consisted of 18 patients (11 girls and 7 boys) with a mean age of 8.63 +/- 1.09 years and the RME group 17 patients (11 girls and 6 boys) with a mean age of 8.78 +/- 1.21 years. A splint type tooth- and tissue-borne modified bonded RME appliance was used, with the patients activating the screw two-quarter turns per day for the first week, followed by one-quarter turn every other day in the SRME group and two-quarter turns per day throughout treatment in the RME group. The average treatment time was 57.16 +/- 21.52 and 21.23 +/- 8.36 days for the SRME and RME groups, respectively. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate the treatment effects [pre-(T(0)) - post-(T(1)) treatment changes] for both the SRME and RME groups and a Mann-Whitney U-test to determine the differences between the two groups (T(0)-T(1) changes SRME versus T(0)-T(1) changes RME). For both groups, the maxillary base, nasal cavity width and upper intercanine and intermolar distances were increased, and the upper molars tipped buccally. The only statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference between two groups was in inferior movement of posterior nasal spine (PNS) relative to the SN plane (SN upper left and right quadrantsPNS). This measurement increased in both groups yet significantly more in the RME group. The results suggest that RME and SRME have similar effects on dentofacial structures both in the transverse, vertical, and sagittal planes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19797410     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  7 in total

1.  Determination of forces on a split palatal screw after rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Valentin Javier García; Rubén López-Cancelos; Antonio Riveiro; Rafael Comesaña; Josep Maria Ustrell I Torrent; Khaled Kasem; Aida Badaoui; Mª Cristina Manzanares-Céspedes; Patricia Carvalho-Lobato
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Does the rhythm and appliance type of rapid maxillary expansion have an effect on root resorption?

Authors:  Sıddık Malkoç; Rukiye Alçin; Aslıhan Uzel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Differential Benefit of Two Different Tooth-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances in Female Subjects.

Authors:  Lale Taner; Gamze Metin-Gürsoy; Naciye Derin Sarısu-Demircioğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-11

Review 4.  Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites.

Authors:  Alessandro Ugolini; Paola Agostino; Armando Silvestrini-Biavati; Jayne E Harrison; Klaus Bsl Batista
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-24

5.  Evaluation of palate area before and after rapid maxillary expansion, using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Carolina Bruder; Cristina Lucia Feijó Ortolani; Tatiana Araújo de Lima; Flavia Artese; Kurt Faltin Junior
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-11-11

Review 6.  The effectiveness of the early orthodontic correction of functional unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition period: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Danya Hassan Alsawaf; Salam Ghazwan Almaasarani; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Nada Rajeh
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.247

7.  Dentofacial changes from fan-type rapid maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion in early mixed dentition.

Authors:  Bayram Çörekçi; Yasar B Göyenç
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.079

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.