Literature DB >> 19797109

Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Jodi M Coates1, Shannon H Beal, Jack E Russo, Kimberly A Vanderveen, Steven L Chen, Richard J Bold, Robert J Canter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage (BD) on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Biliary drainage prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial. Proponents argue that it facilitates referral to high-volume tertiary centers, while detractors maintain that it increases surgical morbidity and mortality.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of single-institution tumor registry database.
SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: From October 1, 2003, to May 31, 2008, 90 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary mass lesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinicopathologic data were reviewed and analyzed among patients who did and did not receive BD for their association with perioperative outcomes. chi(2) Analysis, independent-samples t tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used as appropriate.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (62%) underwent BD, and 34 (38%) did not. Intraoperative bile cultures were positive for 1 or more species of microorganisms in 88% of stented patients (35 of 40). There were no significant differences in fluid requirements, transfusion requirements, or surgery duration between patients who did and did not undergo BD. Estimated blood loss was increased in patients who received BD (625 mL vs 525 mL in patients who did not undergo BD; P = .03), while reoperation was significantly more common in nonstented patients (4% vs 15% in patients who did not undergo BD; P = .02). Intensive care unit stay, overall length of stay, pancreatic leak/abscess/fistula, infectious complications, postoperative percutaneous drainage, hospital readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality were not significantly different between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative biliary stents may complicate the intraoperative management and lessen the postoperative complications of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, only estimated blood loss and reoperation were significantly different in this cohort. Further study may reveal patient subgroups who may specifically benefit or suffer from preoperative biliary stenting. Currently, selective preoperative BD appears appropriate in the multidisciplinary management of patients with periampullary lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19797109     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  29 in total

Review 1.  Current status of preoperative drainage for distal biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Harutoshi Sugiyama; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Yuji Sakai; Rintaro Mikata; Shin Yasui; Yuto Watanabe; Dai Sakamoto; Masato Nakamura; Reina Sasaki; Jun-Ichi Senoo; Yuko Kusakabe; Masahiro Hayashi; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-28

2.  Influence of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: single centre experience.

Authors:  F Francesco di Mola; Francesca Tavano; R Rita Rago; Antonio De Bonis; M Rosa Valvano; Angelo Andriulli; Pierluigi di Sebastiano
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Current status of preoperative biliary drainage.

Authors:  Junko Umeda; Takao Itoi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Current surgical management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Charles B Kim; Shuja Ahmed; Eddy C Hsueh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-09

5.  Changes in preoperative endoscopic and percutaneous bile drainage in patients with periampullary cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in Ontario: effect on clinical practice of a randomized trial.

Authors:  D J Kagedan; J D Mosko; M E Dixon; P J Karanicolas; A C Wei; N Goyert; Q Li; N Mittmann; N G Coburn
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Prognostic Impact of Bacterobilia on Morbidity and Postoperative Management After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Müssle; Sebastian Hempel; Christoph Kahlert; Marius Distler; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Improving outcomes in pancreatic cancer: key points in perioperative management.

Authors:  José M Alamo; Luis M Marín; Gonzalo Suarez; Carmen Bernal; Juan Serrano; Lydia Barrera; Miguel A Gómez; Jordi Muntané; Francisco J Padillo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Five days of postoperative antimicrobial therapy decreases infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients at risk for bile contamination.

Authors:  Isabelle Sourrouille; Sebastien Gaujoux; Guillaume Lacave; François Bert; Safi Dokmak; Jacques Belghiti; Catherine Paugam-Burtz; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Impact of biliary stenting on surgical outcome in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. A retrospective study in a single institution.

Authors:  Christos Agalianos; Konstantina Paraskeva; Nikolaos Gouvas; Demetrios Davides; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Surgery for pancreatic carcinoma: state of the art.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.