Literature DB >> 19796834

Interpersonal synchronization during side by side treadmill walking is influenced by leg length differential and altered sensory feedback.

Jeff A Nessler1, Sara J Gilliland.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Unintentional synchronization of stepping occurs frequently between two people walking side by side, yet little is known regarding the neurological and biomechanical mechanisms that underlie this coupling. The purpose of this study was to quantify the relationship between leg length differential, select variables related to sensory feedback, and unintentional, interpersonal synchronization during gait.
METHODS: Twenty pairs of participants stepped on side by side treadmills under six different conditions in which visual, auditory, and tactile feedback were altered.
RESULTS: When compared with an estimate of synchronization expected to occur by chance, synchronization of stepping was significantly greater in each sensory condition examined. Overall, 62% of pairs exhibited unintentional step frequency locking. Pairs that exhibited entrainment had significantly lower leg length differences between partners (independent t-test, p=.044), and a significant relationship was found between leg length difference and both difference in frequency of stepping (R(2)=.258, p<.022) and frequency locking (R(2)=0.307, p=.011). Altering sensory information appeared to have little effect on the amount of step frequency locking, but improved phase angle locking. Specifically, the addition of a mechanical coupling between participants resulted in a significant increase in the amount of time spent phase locked when compared with the case where normal vision and sound were restricted between participants. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that unintentional gait entrainment can be reproduced in a laboratory setting using side by side treadmills, and that anthropometric properties, such as leg length, have a significant effect on gait synchronization. Further, alterations in sensory information can affect unintentional, interpersonal synchronization, but this behavior appears to be relatively robust to changes in sensory feedback pathways related to gait. 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19796834     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  28 in total

1.  Timing movements to interval durations specified by discrete or continuous sounds.

Authors:  Matthew W M Rodger; Cathy M Craig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Strong anticipation: complexity matching in interpersonal coordination.

Authors:  Vivien Marmelat; Didier Delignières
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006-2012).

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Yi-Huang Su
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

Review 4.  Rhythmic entrainment: Why humans want to, fireflies can't help it, pet birds try, and sea lions have to be bribed.

Authors:  Margaret Wilson; Peter F Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

5.  Influence of stimulus velocity profile on unintentional visuomotor entrainment depends on eye movements.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; R C Schmidt; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Switching dynamics in an interpersonal competition brings about "deadlock" synchronization of players.

Authors:  Akifumi Kijima; Koji Kadota; Keiko Yokoyama; Motoki Okumura; Hiroo Suzuki; R C Schmidt; Yuji Yamamoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Word-by-word entrainment of speech rhythm during joint story building.

Authors:  Tommi Himberg; Lotta Hirvenkari; Anne Mandel; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-12

Review 8.  Self-generated sounds of locomotion and ventilation and the evolution of human rhythmic abilities.

Authors:  Matz Larsson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  A developmental study of the effect of music training on timed movements.

Authors:  Thenille Braun Janzen; William F Thompson; Ronald Ranvaud
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Dyadic movement synchronization while performing incongruent trajectories requires mutual adaptation.

Authors:  Tamara Lorenz; Björn N S Vlaskamp; Anna-Maria Kasparbauer; Alexander Mörtl; Sandra Hirche
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.