Mark A Glazebrook1, Kory Arsenault, Michael Dunbar. 1. Dalhousie University, Division of Orthopaedics, Room 4867 Halifax Infirmary, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3A7, Canada. markglazebr@ns.sympatico.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has become a viable treatment for end-stage ankle arthrosis. Current literature on survival rates and complications of TAA consist of mostly retrospective Level IV papers that do not provide a system for classifying complications. The aim of the current review is to provide a summary of TAA implant survival and complication rates from current literature on outcomes of second or third generation ankle prostheses and subsequently propose a classification system. METHODS: A literature review was used to identify articles reporting complications and failures of TAA ankle prostheses. Inclusion criteria included studies with at least 25 cases and a minimum of 24 months followup. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of failed TAA reported for the short- and intermediate-term followup in this review ranged from 1.3 to 32.3 % with an overall mean of 12.4 % failure at 64 months. Nine main complications of TAA were identified. CONCLUSION: Deep infection, aseptic loosening and implant failure should be considered ;;high-grade'' complications since they will result in failure greater than 50% of the time. Technical error, subsidence and postoperative bone fracture should be considered "medium-grade'', while intra-op bone fractures and wound healing problems should be considered "low-grade''. We believe this review provides the groundwork for uniform complication reporting in TAA and allows the development of a classification system that will provide prognostic information that may serve to guide postoperative care of patients receiving TAA.
BACKGROUND: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has become a viable treatment for end-stage ankle arthrosis. Current literature on survival rates and complications of TAA consist of mostly retrospective Level IV papers that do not provide a system for classifying complications. The aim of the current review is to provide a summary of TAA implant survival and complication rates from current literature on outcomes of second or third generation ankle prostheses and subsequently propose a classification system. METHODS: A literature review was used to identify articles reporting complications and failures of TAA ankle prostheses. Inclusion criteria included studies with at least 25 cases and a minimum of 24 months followup. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of failed TAA reported for the short- and intermediate-term followup in this review ranged from 1.3 to 32.3 % with an overall mean of 12.4 % failure at 64 months. Nine main complications of TAA were identified. CONCLUSION:Deep infection, aseptic loosening and implant failure should be considered ;;high-grade'' complications since they will result in failure greater than 50% of the time. Technical error, subsidence and postoperative bone fracture should be considered "medium-grade'', while intra-op bone fractures and wound healing problems should be considered "low-grade''. We believe this review provides the groundwork for uniform complication reporting in TAA and allows the development of a classification system that will provide prognostic information that may serve to guide postoperative care of patients receiving TAA.
Authors: Mai P Nguyen; Douglas R Pedersen; Yubo Gao; Charles L Saltzman; Annunziato Amendola Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Daniel C Norvell; Jane B Shofer; Sigvard T Hansen; James Davitt; John G Anderson; Donald Bohay; J Chris Coetzee; John Maskill; Michael Brage; Michael Houghton; William R Ledoux; Bruce J Sangeorzan Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Alexej Barg; Katharina Barg; Stefan W Schneider; Geert Pagenstert; Marcel Gloyer; Heath B Henninger; Victor Valderrabano Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2013-09-28
Authors: Charles L Saltzman; Stephen L Hillis; Mary P Stolley; Donald D Anderson; Annunziato Amendola Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Stephanie Noelle; Claus C Egidy; Michael B Cross; Matthias Gebauer; Wolfgang Klauser Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Michael J Dunbar; Jason W Fong; David A Wilson; Allan W Hennigar; Patricia A Francis; Mark A Glazebrook Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 3.717