Literature DB >> 19796462

The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience.

Jennifer Yates1, George Haleblian, Barry Stein, Bradley Miller, Joseph Renzulli, Gyan Pareek.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Open pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) remains the gold standard in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Recently, our institution has adopted robotic assistance for performing radical prostatectomy. We sought to determine whether robot-assisted laparoscopic PLND yields comparable numbers of lymph nodes compared to open PLND.
METHODS: The medical records of patients undergoing open or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) with concurrent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) between 2003 and 2008 were reviewed. Demographic factors including age, PSA, and Gleason score were recorded. Pathology reports were reviewed to determine the number of pelvic lymph nodes obtained during PLND. Lymph node yield was further evaluated based on surgeon. Student's t-test was used to compare the number of lymph nodes obtained with each method.
RESULTS: A total of 61 patients undergoing open RRP with PLND and 62 patients undergoing RALRP with PLND were included. The mean number of lymph nodes obtained via open PLND was 7.3 while the mean number obtained via robotic PLND was 3.3. These means were significantly different with a p value < 0.001. One patient in the open cohort (1.6%) and two patients in the robotic cohort (3.2%) had micrometastatic disease on PLND.
CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic PLND yielded fewer lymph nodes compared to open PLND at the time of radical prostatectomy for organ confined disease. Patients with higher risk disease may benefit from open prostatectomy with PLND early in a program's robotics experience. These findings may be related to the relative youth of our robotics program and further comparisons as our data mature will be revealing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19796462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  4 in total

1.  Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew H Feifer; Elena B Elkin; William T Lowrance; Brian Denton; Lindsay Jacks; David S Yee; Jonathan A Coleman; Vincent P Laudone; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

3.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: technical considerations and review of the literature.

Authors:  Sean P Stroup; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2011-09-25

4.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: difficult to start, fast to improve? Influence of surgical experience in robotic and open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Martin Baunacke; Awab Azawia; Johannes Huber; Christer Groeben; Christian Thomas; Angelika Borkowetz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.