Literature DB >> 19796413

Influence of moisture accumulation in inline spacer on delivery of aerosol using metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation.

Hui-Ling Lin1, James B Fink, Yue Zhou, Yung-Sung Cheng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A practitioner questioned whether moisture that collected in the ventilator circuit and spacer affected the delivery of aerosol from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). An in vitro model was used to quantify the impact of accumulated humidity in a pMDI spacer and ventilator over time.
METHODS: A ventilator with an adult heated-wire ventilator circuit and humidifier was set to deliver adult settings. An impactor was placed between the endotracheal tube and the test lung to determine drug mass and mass median aerodynamic diameter of the aerosol delivered. An AeroVent pMDI spacer was placed in the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit and left in an open position. Eight actuations of HFA albuterol pMDI (720 microg) was administered at 1, 2, and 3 hours after the heater had reached equilibrium at 37 degrees C, and <10 min after turning off the heater/humidifier. The spacer was dried and returned to the heated circuit for additional testing. Samples were analyzed via spectrophotometer. One-way analysis of variance was applied (P<.05).
RESULTS: The delivered drug as a percent of emitted dose (mean+/-SD) was greater at hour one (23+/-2.1%) and with the dry spacer (21.8+/-3.3%) than at hours 2 and 3 or with humidifier off (11.4+/-3.8%, 12.3+/-0.8%, and 12.7+/-0.3%, respectively, P=.002). Mass median aerodynamic diameters with each comparison did not vary between conditions. Delivery efficiency was similar for the dry spacer and the spacer in the humidified circuit for one hour. However, once visible condensate occurred, drug delivery efficiency decreased by approximately 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: Aerosol delivery from a pMDI with spacer during mechanical ventilation was greater with a dry spacer and unchanged for the first hour after initiating heated humidification. Turning off the heated humidifier did not increase drug delivered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19796413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  6 in total

Review 1.  Aerosol delivery via invasive ventilation: a narrative review.

Authors:  Hui-Ling Lin; James B Fink; Huiqing Ge
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 2.  Inhaled antibiotics during mechanical ventilation-why it will work.

Authors:  Maxime Desgrouas; Stephan Ehrmann
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

3.  The utilization of aerosol therapy in mechanical ventilation patients: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study and a review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Shan Lyu; Jie Li; Limin Yang; Xiaoliang Du; Xiaoyi Liu; Libo Chuan; Guoqiang Jing; Zhenyan Wang; Weiwei Shu; Chunjuan Ye; Qionglan Dong; Jun Duan; James B Fink; Zhancheng Gao; Zongan Liang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-09

4.  Aerosol Delivery to a Critically Ill Patient: A Big Issue Easily Solved by Developing Guidelines.

Authors:  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim
Journal:  Pulm Ther       Date:  2018-07-31

Review 5.  Nebulized antibiotics in mechanically ventilated patients: a challenge for translational research from technology to clinical care.

Authors:  Stephan Ehrmann; Jean Chastre; Patrice Diot; Qin Lu
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 6.  A narrative review on trans-nasal pulmonary aerosol delivery.

Authors:  Jie Li; James B Fink; Ronan MacLoughlin; Rajiv Dhand
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.