Literature DB >> 19795119

The concentration of polysaccharides and proteins in EPS of Pseudomonas putida and Aureobasidum pullulans as revealed by 13C CPMAS NMR spectroscopy.

Ulrich Metzger1, Ulrich Lankes, Kai Fischpera, Fritz H Frimmel.   

Abstract

Extracellular polymeric substances were extracted from the bacterial strain Pseudomonas putida and the fungal species Aureobasidium pullulans using three different methods (formaldehyde-NaOH, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and cation-exchange-resin). The composition of the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) was analysed by biochemical and high-resolution solid state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic methods. The EPS yield was strongly dependent on the extraction method, with the formaldehyde-NaOH method showing the best extraction efficiency. The NMR method revealed that when using the EDTA extraction method, about 40% of the EDTA accumulated in the EPS and that was responsible for the apparent high extraction yields. EPS protein content determined by the NMR method was up to 30% higher than the protein content determined using the biochemical (Lowry) method for P. putida and for A. pullulans. The average protein carbon content determined by the NMR method was approximately 70% of the total carbon content. NMR results could be supported by elemental analysis, which showed a high nitrogen content (approximately 10%) in the EPS. The carbohydrate carbon content detected with both methods in the cell aggregates and the EPS was approximately 20% in each. In this study, quantitative 13C cross-polarisation magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy was conducted on unlabeled cell strains, and EPS and could be used to quantify protein and carbohydrate of different samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19795119     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2218-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  7 in total

Review 1.  EDTA: An Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Agent for Use in Wound Care.

Authors:  Simon Finnegan; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Responses of Acinetobacter baumannii Bound and Loose Extracellular Polymeric Substances to Hyperosmotic Agents Combined with or without Tobramycin: An Atomic Force Microscopy Study.

Authors:  Muhammedin Deliorman; F Pinar Gordesli Duatepe; Emily K Davenport; Boel A Fransson; Douglas R Call; Haluk Beyenal; Nehal I Abu-Lail
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.882

3.  Did mineral surface chemistry and toxicity contribute to evolution of microbial extracellular polymeric substances?

Authors:  Jie Xu; Jay M Campbell; Nianli Zhang; William J Hickey; Nita Sahai
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Terpenoid bioactive compound from Streptomyces rochei (M32): taxonomy, fermentation and biological activities.

Authors:  Raasaiyah Pazhanimurugan; Manikkam Radhakrishnan; Thangavel Shanmugasundaram; Venugopal Gopikrishnan; Ramasamy Balagurunathan
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Isolation of Extracellular Polymeric Substances from Biofilms of the Thermoacidophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius.

Authors:  Silke Jachlewski; Witold D Jachlewski; Uwe Linne; Christopher Bräsen; Jost Wingender; Bettina Siebers
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-27

6.  Characterization of the biofilm matrix composition of psychrotrophic, meat spoilage pseudomonads.

Authors:  Nirmani N Wickramasinghe; Mya M Hlaing; Joshua T Ravensdale; Ranil Coorey; P Scott Chandry; Gary A Dykes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Physicochemical Properties of Extracellular Polymeric Substances Produced by Three Bacterial Isolates From Biofouled Reverse Osmosis Membranes.

Authors:  Zahid Ur Rehman; Johannes S Vrouwenvelder; Pascal E Saikaly
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.