Literature DB >> 19795027

Computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment efficacy and complications.

Fotios Laspas1, Evangelia Sotiropoulou, Sophia Mylona, Anita Manataki, Paraskevi Tsagouli, Iris Tsangaridou, Loukas Thanos.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and complications of computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: A retrospective study of 282 patients (231 males, 51 females, age range: 44-76 years, mean age: 62 years) with HCC (322 lesions) who had been treated by CT-guided RFA over a period of 5 years, was performed. The diameter of the tumors ranged from 1.5 to 5 cm. The tumors were considered as ablated completely, if no viability was found on dual-phase dynamic contrast enhanced CT at 1 month after RFA. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 68 months (mean 29 months) and included a dual-phase dynamic contrast enhanced CT at 1, 3 and 6 months post-RFA and every 6 months afterwards. Patient outcome was evaluated and the survival and recurrence rates were assessed. Each case was reviewed for short-term and long-term complications.
RESULTS: The ablation success rate was 87.3% (281/322 HCC nodules), while 41 (12.7%) lesions were managed with repeated RFA because of tumor residue. The survival rates at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years were 94.8%, 86.6%, 73.1%, 64.2% and 51.1%, respectively. A total number of 9 (2.8% per procedure) minor complications occurred. No major complications were observed. During the follow-up period, the local tumour progression rate was 22%, while the recurrence rate of new intrahepatic nodules was 48%.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study support that RFA is an effective and safe technique for the treatment of unresectable HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19795027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis        ISSN: 1841-8724            Impact factor:   2.008


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound- and CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of non-operation hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Ping Chen; Yang-gui Xie; Nian-mei Gong; Lin-lin Sun; Chun-feng Sun
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography used for post-treatment responses evaluation of radiofrequency ablations for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weixiang Shi; Ying He; Wenbin Ding; Shenchu Gong; Yilang Wang; Jing Xiao; Bosheng He
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  MR-guided radiofrequency ablation using a wide-bore 1.5-T MR system: clinical results of 213 treated liver lesions.

Authors:  Hansjörg Rempp; Lorenz Waibel; Rüdiger Hoffmann; Claus D Claussen; Philippe L Pereira; Stephan Clasen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Review of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance in ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yasunori Minami; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Local Tumor Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Microwave Percutaneous Ablation: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Franco Brunello; Patrizia Carucci; Silvia Gaia; Emanuela Rolle; Paola Rita Brunocilla; Anna Castiglione; Giovannino Ciccone; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2012-01-20

6.  Comparable Outcomes of Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography in the Guidance of Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Lu-Hung Lee; Jen-I Hwang; Yu-Chi Cheng; Chun-Ying Wu; Shou-Wu Lee; Sheng-Shun Yang; Hong-Zen Yeh; Chi-Sen Chang; Teng-Yu Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Computed tomographic-guided radiofrequency ablation of recurrent or residual hepatocellular carcinomas around retained iodized oil after transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Young Hwan Koh; Joon-Il Choi; Hyun Beom Kim; Min Ju Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.