Literature DB >> 19794190

The amygdala is not necessary for unconditioned stimulus inflation after Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats.

Christine A Rabinak1, Caitlin A Orsini, Joshua M Zimmerman, Stephen Maren.   

Abstract

The basolateral complex (BLA) and central nucleus (CEA) of the amygdala play critical roles in associative learning, including Pavlovian conditioning. However, the precise role for these structures in Pavlovian conditioning is not clear. Recent work in appetitive conditioning paradigms suggests that the amygdala, particularly the BLA, has an important role in representing the value of the unconditioned stimulus (US). It is not known whether the amygdala performs such a function in aversive paradigms, such as Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats. To address this issue, Experiments 1 and 2 used temporary pharmacological inactivation of the amygdala prior to a US inflation procedure to assess its role in revaluing shock USs after either overtraining (Experiment 1) or limited training (Experiment 2), respectively. Inactivation of the BLA or CEA during the inflation session did not affect subsequent increases in conditioned freezing observed to either the tone conditioned stimulus (CS) or the conditioning context in either experiment. In Experiment 3, NBQX infusions into the BLA impaired the acquisition of auditory fear conditioning with an inflation-magnitude US, indicating that the amygdala is required for associative learning with intense USs. Together, these results suggest that the amygdala is not required for revaluing an aversive US despite being required for the acquisition of fear to that US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19794190      PMCID: PMC2769164          DOI: 10.1101/lm.1531309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  64 in total

Review 1.  The amygdala: vigilance and emotion.

Authors:  M Davis; P J Whalen
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 15.992

2.  Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Parallel circuits mediating distinct emotional coping reactions to different types of stress.

Authors:  K A Keay; R Bandler
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Memory consolidation of Pavlovian fear conditioning: a cellular and molecular perspective.

Authors:  G E Schafe; K Nader; H T Blair; J E LeDoux
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Both pre- and posttraining excitotoxic lesions of the basolateral amygdala abolish the expression of olfactory and contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  G Cousens; T Otto
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 6.  A modern learning theory perspective on the etiology of panic disorder.

Authors:  M E Bouton; S Mineka; D H Barlow
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  The psychobiological basis of posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  C Grillon; S M Southwick; D S Charney
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 15.992

8.  When fear is near: threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Predrag Petrovic; Jennifer L Marchant; Demis Hassabis; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Double dissociation between the involvement of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and the central nucleus of the amygdala in startle increases produced by conditioned versus unconditioned fear.

Authors:  D L Walker; M Davis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Appetitive behavior: impact of amygdala-dependent mechanisms of emotional learning.

Authors:  Barry J Everitt; Rudolf N Cardinal; John A Parkinson; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Re-valuing the amygdala.

Authors:  Sara E Morrison; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Chemogenetic Inhibition Reveals That Processing Relative But Not Absolute Threat Requires Basal Amygdala.

Authors:  Vincent D Campese; Ian T Kim; Mian Hou; Saurav Gupta; Cassandra Draus; Botagoz Kurpas; Kelsey Burke; Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Inactivation of the central but not the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala disrupts learning in response to overexpectation of reward.

Authors:  Richard Z Haney; Donna J Calu; Yuji K Takahashi; Brian W Hughes; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of muscarinic receptor antagonism in the basolateral amygdala on two-way active avoidance.

Authors:  Anna Carballo-Márquez; Pere Boadas-Vaello; Irene Villarejo-Rodríguez; Gemma Guillazo-Blanch; Margarita Martí-Nicolovius; Anna Vale-Martínez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reorganization of Basolateral Amygdala-Subiculum Circuitry in Mouse Epilepsy Model.

Authors:  Dong Liang Ma; Jian Qiang Qu; Eyleen L K Goh; Feng Ru Tang
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.856

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.