Literature DB >> 19794133

Olfactory mucosal autografts and rehabilitation for chronic traumatic spinal cord injury.

Carlos Lima1, Pedro Escada, José Pratas-Vital, Catarina Branco, Carlo Alberto Arcangeli, Giovanna Lazzeri, Carlos Alberto Santana Maia, Clara Capucho, Armando Hasse-Ferreira, Jean D Peduzzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: Basic science advances in spinal cord injury (SCI) are leading to novel clinical approaches. The authors report a prospective, uncontrolled pilot study of the safety and outcomes of implanting olfactory mucosal autografts (OMA) in 20 patients with chronic, sensorimotor complete or motor complete SCI.
METHODS: Seven paraplegic and 13 tetraplegic subjects (17 men and 3 women; 19-37 years old) who sustained a traumatic SCI 18 to 189 months previously (mean = 49 months) were enrolled. Preoperative rehabilitation that emphasized lower extremity stepping using either overground walking training or a robotic weight-supported treadmill training was provided for 25 to 39 hours per week for a median of 4 months at 3 sites. No change in ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) motor scores for the lower extremities or AIS grades of completeness was found. OMAs were transplanted into 1.3- to 4-cm lesions at C4-T12 neurological levels after partial scar removal. Therapy was continued postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included AIS scores and classification, electromyography (EMG) of attempted voluntary contractions, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), urodynamic studies with sphincter EMG, spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and otolaryngology and psychology evaluations. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) were obtained in 13 patients.
RESULTS: All patients survived and recovered olfaction. One patient was rehospitalized for aseptic meningitis. Minor adverse events occurred in 4 others. The mean duration of follow-up was 27.7 months (range = 12-45 months). By MRI, the lesion site was filled in all patients with no neoplastic overgrowth or syringomyelia. AIS grades improved in 11 of 20 patients, 6 (A --> C), 3 (B --> C), and 2 (A --> B), and declined in 1 (B --> A). Improvements included new voluntary EMG responses (15 patients) and SSEPs (4 patients). Scores improved in the FIM and WISCI (13/13 tested), and urodynamic responses improved in 5 patients.
CONCLUSION: OMA is feasible, relatively safe, and possibly beneficial in people with chronic SCI when combined with postoperative rehabilitation. Future controlled trials may need to include a lengthy and intensive rehabilitation arm as a control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19794133     DOI: 10.1177/1545968309347685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  58 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in spinal cord neurology.

Authors:  Volker Dietz
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  The Specific Requirements of Neural Repair Trials for Stroke.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Stem cell clinical trials for spinal cord injury: readiness, reluctance, redefinition.

Authors:  J Illes; J C Reimer; B K Kwon
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Effectiveness of intense, activity-based physical therapy for individuals with spinal cord injury in promoting motor and sensory recovery: is olfactory mucosa autograft a factor?

Authors:  Cathy A Larson; Paula M Dension
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Intramedullary cervical spinal mass after stem cell transplantation using an olfactory mucosal cell autograft.

Authors:  Claire F Woodworth; Gregory Jenkins; Jane Barron; Nanette Hache
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Implications of olfactory lamina propria transplantation on hyperreflexia and myelinated fiber regeneration in rats with complete spinal cord transection.

Authors:  Lígia Aline Centenaro; Mariane da Cunha Jaeger; Jocemar Ilha; Marcelo Alves de Souza; Luciane Fachin Balbinot; Patrícia Severo do Nascimento; Simone Marcuzzo; Matilde Achaval
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 7.  Emerging therapies for acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jefferson R Wilson; Nicole Forgione; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Andrew Dorsch
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 9.  Current status of cell-mediated regenerative therapies for human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Tongming Zhu; Qisheng Tang; Huasong Gao; Yiwen Shen; Luping Chen; Jianhong Zhu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.203

10.  Electrophysiological Outcome Measures in Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Radha Korupolu; Argyrios Stampas; Mani Singh; Ping Zhou; Gerard Francisco
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2019
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.