Literature DB >> 19793965

Nasal airflow rate affects the sensitivity and pattern of glomerular odorant responses in the mouse olfactory bulb.

Yuki Oka1, Yoshiki Takai, Kazushige Touhara.   

Abstract

Sniffing is a characteristic odor sampling behavior in various mammalian species, which is associated with an increase in both nasal airflow rate and breathing frequency. Although the importance of sniffing in olfaction is well recognized, it has been challenging to separate the effect of airflow rate and sniffing frequency in vivo. In this study, we examined the individual effects of airflow rate and frequency on odorant responses of glomeruli in the mouse olfactory bulb (OB) using calcium imaging techniques and an artificial sniffing system. We found that nasal airflow rate, but not sniffing frequency, affected the apparent glomerular responses. When measured using OB imaging, apparent sensitivity for some of the odorants was significantly greater at the high nasal flow rates, while other odorants exhibited the opposite effect. In a single defined glomerulus, the sensitivity shift caused by changes in flow rate varied between odorants, suggesting that the flow rate effect is dependent on the chemical properties of an odorant rather than on the specific characteristics of the expressed olfactory receptor. Using natural flavors containing a variety of odorants, different glomerular activation patterns were observed between breathing and sniffing condition, likely due to odorant-dependent flow rate effects. Our results provide important information on in vivo odorant recognition and suggest that odor representation in the OB is not fixed but rather varies significantly depending on the respiratory state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19793965      PMCID: PMC6666155          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1415-09.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  23 in total

1.  Signaling by sensory receptors.

Authors:  David Julius; Jeremy Nathans
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Ionotropic and metabotropic mechanisms in chemoreception: 'chance or design'?

Authors:  Ana Florencia Silbering; Richard Benton
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Dorsorostral snout muscles in the rat subserve coordinated movement for whisking and sniffing.

Authors:  Sebastian Haidarliu; David Golomb; David Kleinfeld; Ehud Ahissar
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 4.  Visualizing odor representation in the brain: a review of imaging techniques for the mapping of sensory activity in the olfactory glomeruli.

Authors:  F Pain; B L'heureux; H Gurden
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  All in a sniff: olfaction as a model for active sensing.

Authors:  Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Functional deprivation promotes amyloid plaque pathogenesis in Tg2576 mouse olfactory bulb and piriform cortex.

Authors:  Xue-Mei Zhang; Kun Xiong; Yan Cai; Huaibin Cai; Xue-Gang Luo; Jia-Chun Feng; Richard W Clough; Peter R Patrylo; Robert G Struble; Xiao-Xin Yan
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Respiration drives network activity and modulates synaptic and circuit processing of lateral inhibition in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Matthew E Phillips; Robert N S Sachdev; David C Willhite; Gordon M Shepherd
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Enzymatic conversion of odorants in nasal mucus affects olfactory glomerular activation patterns and odor perception.

Authors:  Ayumi Nagashima; Kazushige Touhara
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Testing the sorption hypothesis in olfaction: a limited role for sniff strength in shaping primary odor representations during behavior.

Authors:  Tristan Cenier; John P McGann; Yusuke Tsuno; Justus V Verhagen; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Stimulation of electro-olfactogram responses in the main olfactory epithelia by airflow depends on the type 3 adenylyl cyclase.

Authors:  Xuanmao Chen; Zhengui Xia; Daniel R Storm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.